Legal Briefs: Money for nothing
- By Kellie Lunney
- June 30, 2000
- Comments
Every Friday on GovExec.com, Legal Briefs reviews cases that involve, or provide valuable lessons to, federal managers. We report on the decisions of a wide range of review panels, including the Merit Systems Protection Board, the Federal Labor Relations Authority and federal courts.
Kenneth Billings was living in Staunton, Ill., when he became a regional financial institution examiner for the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) in 1997. NCUA is an independent agency that supervises and insures federal and state-chartered credit unions.
Billings' appointment document listed his official duty station as Escanaba, Mich., though he never lived or worked, even temporarily, in or around Escanaba during his tenure.
NCUA explained that, in an attempt by certain agency officials to get around competitive hiring procedures, Billings and other employees were assigned-on paper-to false duty stations. Several NCUA officials were suspended and demoted because of the improper hiring practices.
Before resigning in 1998, Billings filed a claim for almost $20,000 in per diem expenses, saying that since his official duty station was in Escanaba, he should be paid per diem while on temporary duty travel to Staunton. Billings defined "official" as the duty station listed on his appointment document: Escanaba.
The Board of Contract Appeals called the bluff, saying that an employee's permanent duty station is not a debatable matter, but a salient fact, determined "by where an employee expects and is expected to spend the greater part of his time."
Lesson: There may be no place like home, but there's no per diem for being there.
In the Matter of Kenneth E. Billings (GSBCA 15264-TRAV) GSBCA, May 30, 2000.
By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although GovExec.com does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.
Older Feds Aren't Playing to Their Strengths
Is It Too Hard to Fire Misbehaving Feds?
Americans Still Like the Postal Service
A Forced 4-Day Weekend for Many Feds
No More Tax-Cheating Feds, Senators Say
Video: The Daily Show on Apple's Taxes
Cutting costs: Inside the effort to improve the efficiency of federal operations
Sponsored
3 Ways Data is Improving DoD Performance
Research Report: Powering Continuous Monitoring Through Big Data
Need to Know Memo: Big Data
