Legal Briefs: Handcuff harassment

ksaldarini@govexec.com, klunney@govexec.com

Every Friday on GovExec.com, Legal Briefs reviews cases that involve, or provide valuable lessons to, federal managers. We report on the decisions of a wide range of review panels, including the Merit Systems Protection Board, the Federal Labor Relations Authority and federal courts.

Burnis Tate, an African American Veterans Affairs vehicle operator, was driving a patient to VA's Overton Brooks Medical Center in Shreveport, La. Upon arrival, he and a white co-worker became involved in an altercation with officials of the medical center and Tate was assaulted by the chief of the center's Ambulatory Care and Processing Section. Security officers threatened to put him in handcuffs.

Tate's co-worker was ignored, even though he was the one who had annoyed the assaulter. According to witnesses, Tate did not speak loudly or react defiantly. But that's why VA said it sent out the guards to begin with.

Tate filed a complaint of racial discrimination for the way he was treated, but the agency did not uphold it. Instead VA apologized, but offered no explanation for the chief's behavior.

Tate took his complaint to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which found the VA guilty of discrimination and poor manners. He was awarded $3,000 in compensatory damages.

Lesson: Save the handcuffs for the person doing the harassing.

Burnis Tate v. Veterans Affairs (01986429), Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, April 14, 2000.

Home Away from Home

When David Morrell worked at Peterson Air Force Base in Colorado Springs, Colo., he rented a room in the area and commuted to work daily while his family lived in Paonia, Colo.-more than 200 miles away. He returned to Paonia on holidays and weekends.

Morrell sold the house in Paonia in December 1998 and moved to Rufus, Ore., submitting a claim to the Army for real estate expenses incurred during the sale. The claim was denied.

The version of the Federal Travel Regulation in effect at the time of the incident said the government would reimburse an employee for costs incurred during the sale of a residence at his or her former official station. The FTR defined "official station" as the place from which the employee regularly left from to commute to work.

If Morrell had commuted to a work station in a remote area without adequate family housing, he could have been reimbursed for expenses associated with the sale of the Paonia home. Colorado Springs, however, is not considered to be a remote area.

The Board of Contract Appeals upheld the Army's decision to deny Morrell reimbursement.

Lesson: It's not where you call home, but where you commute from, that counts.

In the Matter of David Morrell (GSBCA 15229-RELO) GSBCA, April 26, 2000

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

    Download
  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

    Download
  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

    Download
  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

    Download
  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.