Pay and Benefits Watch: Give me an S! Give me an I!

If the new record-keeping system for the Thrift Savings Plan is up and running on Oct. 1 as currently planned, then you'll have two new investment options to consider: the I Fund and the S Fund.

Federal employees currently have three investment options: the C Fund, the G Fund and the F Fund. The C Fund invests in common stocks and tracks the S&P 500, an index compiled by Standard & Poor's that monitors the performance of the market's 500 largest publicly traded companies. The G Fund invests in low-risk government securities and the F Fund invests in bonds.

Like the C Fund, the new S and I funds will invest in stocks.

The S Fund will track the Wilshire 4500 index, which covers the thousands of stocks not included in the S&P 500. The Wilshire 4500 tends to be more volatile than the S&P 500, suggesting a similar relationship between the S Fund and the C Fund.

"The Wilshire 4500 index returns tend to fluctuate more than S&P 500 index returns because the prices of the stocks of the smaller companies in the Wilshire 4500 tend to react more strongly (postively and negatively) to changes in the economy," the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board explained in its latest newsletter on the TSP.

The I Fund will track the Europe, Austral-Asia and Far East (EAFE) stock index. The EAFE includes stocks of companies in 20 countries and is affected by both stock price changes and foreign currency changes in relation to the U.S. dollar.

"EAFE index returns tend to fluctuate more than S&P 500 index or Wilshire 4500 index returns; therefore, I Fund investments are expected to be more volatile in the short run than C or S Fund investments," the TSP board said.

The new funds are part of the TSP modernization that will also allow federal employees to make changes to their TSP accounts on a daily basis, rather than once a month under the current system. The new system was supposed to be completed by May 1, but the TSP board delayed the rollout to conduct more tests before the system goes live.

Here is a comparison of the performance of the Wilshire 4500, the EAFE, the S&P 500 and the C Fund from 1990 to 1999.

Year Wilshire
C Fund
1990 - 13.6% - 23.6% - 3.2% - 3.1%
1991 43.5% 12.2% 30.8% 30.5%
1992 11.9% - 12.2% 7.7% 7.6%
1993 14.6% 32.7% 10.1% 10.1%
1994 - 2.7% 7.8% 1.3% 1.3%
1995 33.5% 11.3% 37.4% 37.6%
1996 17.2% 6.1% 22.8% 23.0%
1997 25.7% 1.6% 33.2% 33.4%
1998 8.6% 20.1% 28.4% 28.6%
1999 35.5% 26.7% 21.0% 21.0%
- 1999
annual rate
of return
16.2% 7.0% 18.2% 18.2%

Source: Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

Another way to compare the funds is to consider what $100 invested on Jan. 1, 1990 would be worth as of Jan. 1, 2000. According to the TSP board, a $100 investment in the C Fund would now be worth $532; in the S Fund, $448; in the I Fund, $196. The same $100 invested in the F Fund would be worth $206 now; in the G Fund, $197.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by Brocade

    Best of 2016 Federal Forum eBook

    Earlier this summer, Federal and tech industry leaders convened to talk security, machine learning, network modernization, DevOps, and much more at the 2016 Federal Forum. This eBook includes a useful summary highlighting the best content shared at the 2016 Federal Forum to help agencies modernize their network infrastructure.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    GBC Flash Poll Series: Merger & Acquisitions

    Download this GBC Flash Poll to learn more about federal perspectives on the impact of industry consolidation.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    A DevOps Roadmap for the Federal Government

    This GBC Report discusses how DevOps is steadily gaining traction among some of government's leading IT developers and agencies.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    Joint Enterprise Licensing Agreements

    Read this eBook to learn how defense agencies can achieve savings and efficiencies with an Enterprise Software Agreement.

  • Sponsored by Cloudera

    Government Forum Content Library

    Get all the essential resources needed for effective technology strategies in the federal landscape.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.