Pay and Benefits Watch: Part-time pensions

If you're a longtime federal employee and are thinking about easing into retirement by switching to a part-time work schedule, you might want to think again.

Your pension could suffer.

Back in 1986, Congress decided to change the way pensions are calculated for federal employees who work part-time. Under the pension formula used until that year, sneaky employees could work part-time for most of their careers and then switch to full-time the last three years to collect the same pension as employees who worked full-time their entire careers.

The pre-1986 part-timers' pension formula used the "high-3" salary formula. Say an employee worked part-time their entire career and earned a $30,000 salary during their three highest salary years. The employee's pension would be based on the $30,000 salary. But if the employee switched to full-time for three years and earned $60,000 each of those years, he or she could get a much larger pension.

To prevent crafty part-timers from getting full-time pensions, Congress created the post-1986 part-timers' pension formula. The new formula focuses on actual time in service. So the employee who switched to full-time for three years for $60,000 per year would receive a pro-rated pension that factored in the employee's part-time schedule for most of his or her career.

The new formula is very fair-except for employees or retirees who meet the following criteria:

  • They worked before April 1986.
  • At least a portion of their service before April 1986 was on a full-time basis.
  • They worked part-time and then retired after April 1986, or are still working, plan to work part-time and then retire.

Rosemarie Moore is such a retiree. Moore worked full time from 1962 to 1987 and then switched to a part-time schedule from 1987 to 1994 to care for her mother. Moore returned to a full-time schedule for her last year in federal service. She retired in 1995.

The problem for Moore, and others like her, is that the new part-time pension formula applies only to service after April 1986. Because of the way the formula works for pre-1986 service, people who worked full-time earlier in their careers and then later switched to part-time work receive the same pension as an employee who worked part-time their entire career.

"My 25 years of full-time service were given credit at a part-time rate of pay, even though I paid into the retirement system as a full timer," said Moore, who worked for the Immigration and Naturalization Service. "Such an unfair scheme is definitely not what Congress intended."

Moore and other retirees and employees who have realized that their pensions are reduced because of the 1986 change have begun banding together to get the Office of Personnel Management or Congress to revise the formula so that people like them get pensions that reflect their service.

The part-timers group thinks OPM could fix the problem with a regulatory change. But an OPM official, speaking on background, said the problem is statutory. Congress would have to make the change, the official said.

Sen. Charles Robb, D-Va., has introduced a bill (S. 772) to address the problem. The bill would help both current employees and retirees. The OPM official said the agency supports helping current employees, but trying to identify affected retirees would be an administrative nightmare.

Moore doesn't buy OPM's stance on retirees: "A mistake was made," she said.

The part-timers' group has created a Web site to help people figure out if they are affected. The Web site is at:

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.