Legal Briefs: No more hanky-panky

Every Friday on, Legal Briefs reviews cases that involve, or provide valuable lessons to, federal managers. We report on the decisions of a wide range of review panels, including the Merit Systems Protection Board, the Federal Labor Relations Authority and federal courts.

After six years with the United States Postal Service, Juliana Hackman suddenly found herself the center of unwanted attention.

Hackman transferred from the Cook Street postal facility in Springfield, Ill., to the city's Downtown Station facility in 1992. Over the course of the next four years, Hackman alleged she was subjected to egregious sexual harassment, testifying before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) that several of her co-workers, five in particular, continually used sexually explicit language and engaged in sexually explicit conduct in her presence.

The harassment ranged from making sexual innuendos when discussing mail processing on the work room floor to displaying pornographic pictures in the common area. More inappropriate behavior included a celebratory spanking of another female carrier in honor of her 29th birthday. Graphic discussions on women's physical appearance and sexual preferences also took place openly.

Hackman testified that she went to the postmaster about the problem, who told her he would speak to the offending parties, despite the fact that he didn't agree with her complaint. According to Hackman, matters improved for a short time, but the inappropriate behavior resumed after about two months.

She then approached her female supervisor who advised her to "let it [the harassment] roll off your back."

Hackman filed a discriminatory complaint with the USPS. The agency ruled that Hackman failed to document a specific example of inappropriate sexual behavior, but the EEOC overruled its decision on appeal, finding in favor of Hackman and concluding that the harassment created a hostile and intimidating work environment.

The commission directed the USPS to either take disciplinary action against the offending employees or provide them with 40 hours of EEO sensitivity training.

Hackman will be reimbursed all annual and sick leave used as a result of the agency's discriminatory actions as well as any compensatory damages due.

Lesson: Keep the hanky-panky off the work room floor.

Hackman v. Postal Service (01971882), Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, March 16, 2000.

Russian Roulette

Lemuel Mauldin, a NASA employee, traveled to the Ukraine and Russia in 1997. Mauldin, a veteran of such trips, knew that he would have to pay a charge for excess baggage in Ukrainian currency. So, he converted about $90 worth to pay for the charge. But, as luck would have it, he wasn't charged for excess baggage on this particular trip.

Back in the United States, Mauldin was stuck with the $90 worth of Ukrainian currency. None of the banks he visited would convert it for him. So, when he filled out his travel reimbursement form, Mauldin attached the currency with a note explaining the situation and asked to be reimbursed for the $90 amount.

The travel office denied his claim, chalking it up as an "exchange loss," arguing that the government cannot be held responsible for currency that cannot be reconverted to U.S. dollars.

Meanwhile, the travel office said it returned the currency to Mauldin, but Mauldin said he never received it.

The General Services Board of Contract Appeals examined the case and decided that NASA was incorrectly placing the burden on Mauldin. When Mauldin returned the currency to the travel office, it became government property again. Its loss was, therefore, the government's fault.

The board ordered the agency to reimburse Mauldin the $90.

Lesson: Money is money.

In the matter of Lemuel E. Mauldin, General Services Board of Contract Appeals (15242-TRAV), March 27, 2000.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.