Public advocates enter fray over FOIA

Public interest advocates are gearing up to fight a legislative proposal that would limit the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) in an effort to protect computer networks from hackers.

Five public interest groups sent a letter last month to the Justice Department criticizing a Clinton administration recommendation that would create a new exemption from FOIA for "critical infrastructure information provided voluntarily by a non-federal source." The groups argue that changes to FOIA are not necessary to secure computer networks, and that the landmark 1974 law should not be changed because of pressure from business.

Although Reps. Tom Davis, R-Va., and James Moran, D-Va., said this week that they intend to introduce such legislation in the House, any similar proposals in the Senate would face opposition from Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-VT, ranking member of the Judiciary Committee.

"There are several steps we should be taking to promote Internet security, but weakening FOIA and sunshine-in-government laws should not be one of them," Leahy said, citing several of the same points made by the public interest advocates.

"FOIA is a law of central importance to our system of accountable, democratic government," said the letter from the five groups, the Center for Democracy and Technology, the Federation of American Scientists, the National Security Archive, the Center for National Security Studies, and OMB Watch. "It should not be subject to carve-outs for special interests or special categories of information."

Businesses have been reluctant to cooperate with government computer protection efforts because of fear that any information given to federal agencies would be subject to FOIA, which allows the public access to government information. Following a White House summit last week on cyber security, Information Technology Association of America President Harris Miller singled out the FOIA as the top legislative change necessary to secure industry's cooperation with the administration's critical infrastructure protection plan.

But the public interest groups argue that FOIA already provides exemptions for national defense, trade secrets and proprietary information, and law enforcement action. In a letter to Justice Department senior counsel Stevan Mitchell, they noted that "your proposal would go beyond these exemptions by removing from the purview of FOIA a broad new category of information, loosely defined as 'voluntary submitted critical infrastructure information.'"

"The bill would essentially delegate to private sector companies the ability to decide what information in government files gets made public," the five groups said in their letter. "Once a company submits a document marked with the magic words prescribed by the bill, government are deprived of any authority to make that information public, even if they conclude that it is not sensitive, or moreover, even if they conclude the that critical infrastructure interests of the government would be served by making the information public."

Mitchell stressed that the administration's efforts were merely a "discussion draft" that has not received administrative clearance.

"The idea is to create a protected pipeline so that industry can contribute information that they don't currently contribute," he said. "It doesn't seek to carve out anything from the federal government rules."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.