Pay and Benefits Watch: Dental benefits full of cavities

Over the past year, Congress and the Clinton administration have required health insurance companies participating in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) to provide federal employees with coverage of contraceptives and mental health aid, and to comply with the President's Patients' Bill of Rights.

But federal employees want better dental care coverage more than any other benefit, according to the Blue Cross/Blue Shield Association, which surveys and holds focus groups with the four million FEHBP beneficiaries it covers-45 percent of the federal market.

Dental coverage is not a part of the basic health insurance package offered to federal employees. Employees can get supplemental dental coverage from some insurance plans, but they typically require additional premiums. Blue Cross/Blue Shield's Federal Dental Blue program, for example, requires an additional premium and is only available in five areas around the country.

A federal employee enrolled in Blue Cross/Blue Shield said "current coverage for federal employees is deplorable. There hasn't been significant improvement in dental coverage for services such as orthodontics, bridges and other costly services that older federal employees are now experiencing."

The employee described having to pay $5,000 for two bridges and four teeth cappings.

"This is outrageous," the employee said. "There are private firms whose dental insurance would cover 50 percent or more of those costs."

According to the 1995 Employee Benefits Survey by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 57 percent of private sector employees had dental coverage. Their plans typically covered 100 percent of the costs of routine examinations and X-rays, 80 percent of the costs of fillings and minor surgery, and 50 percent of expensive procedures like crowns and orthodontics.

Focus groups have told the Office of Personnel Management, which runs the FEHBP, that they want better dental coverage. In a recent letter to health insurance companies, OPM encouraged them to offer federal employees non-FEHBP supplemental dental insurance, which requires additional premiums, and to "list such coverage prominently on the non-FEHB page of your plan brochure."

If dental coverage is in such high demand, why hasn't it been made part of the FEHBP?

"We had a lot of things this past year to consider-mental health, Patients' Bill of Rights, long-term care," an OPM spokesperson said. "Basically we had to prioritize. Dental health was not one of the top three or four priorities. In the future, dental benefits will be one of our focuses."

As for Blue Cross/Blue Shield, spokesman Bill Pierce said the insurance company wants to offer federal employees better dental coverage, but is restricted by OPM rules and mandates for other types of coverage.

"OPM hasn't allowed us to expand dental coverage," Pierce said.

Ned Lynch, senior research director at the House Government Reform Civil Service Subcommittee, said dental coverage should not be mandated, but OPM should give insurance companies more freedom to decide what benefits to include in their FEHBP packages.

"OPM's increase in mandates on FEHBP and its standardization of benefits package is robbing employees of the choices they might want," Lynch said. "If FEHBP had a true cafeteria-style menu of health care choices, an employee who wanted to would be able to choose a plan that provides better dental coverage over one that provides better mental benefits."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.