FBI official decries hack attacks, defends infowar

The head of the government agency charged with defending computer networks against unauthorized access said that hackers who deface government Web sites have committed a serious crime, not a harmless prank.

"We don't say that attacks on Web sites are a form of cyberterrorism," said Michael Vatis, chief of the National Infrastructure Protection Center at the FBI. "They are illegal just like spray painting on the White House walls are illegal."

Vatis spoke at a Wednesday afternoon panel discussion on critical infrastructure protection at the American Association for the Advancement of Science. His remarks come during a week when an array of government Web sites, including sites operating by the FBI and the White House, have been broken into and altered by malicious computer users.

"Messages that say, 'If you continue to enforce the laws by conducting investigations against hackers, we are going to come after you,' are an effort to intimidate government officials from enforcing the law," he said.

At the same time, Vatis defended the theoretical use of "infrastructure warfare" measures to counter conventional, or "kinetic," methods of warfare. These could even include U.S.-sponsored attempts to deter an enemy such as Yugoslavia with computer-employed attacks on electric power and financial systems.

The government at the beginning of the decade began serious investigations on how to construct and use computer viruses against enemy computer systems in wartime.

It has long been considered proper "to attack civilian services as an element of warfare under certain conditions," said Vatis. "Why is it unethical to do it under other means?"

But Daniel Kuehl, professor of military strategy at the National Defense University, said that it was not clear whether a computer network attack met internationally recognized norms of force recognized as warfare.

"If states are able to destroy one other without blowing each other up, is that force?" Kuehl questioned. "We don't know that. The technology is way ahead of the law and far ahead of ethics."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.