Agencies warned to beef up Web security

Experts from three government agencies heavily devoted to information technology testified Thursday that in order to keep hackers from breaking into federal government Web sites, agencies need to rely more upon skilled security precautions than legal statutes against computerized breaking-and-entering.

Testifying before a House Science subcommittee Thursday about the vulnerability of federal government Web sites to hackers, representatives from the National Security Agency, the National Institutes of Standards and Technology, and the technical director of the Office of the Chief Scientist at the General Accounting Office agreed that the government needed to get its act together before seeking stiffer penalties against hackers.

"As a result of listening to this testimony, I would like to have some kind of evaluative system within agencies" that report to Congress, Technology Subcommittee Chairwoman Connie Morella, R-Md., said in an interview after the hearing. She said the system could be analogous to current oversights regarding progress made on stamping out problems emanating from the Y2K computer bug.

"We must do something to make sure that agencies must do this," said Morella, saying that previous government directives from the Office of Management and Budget and NIST have been repeatedly ignored. Many agencies have responded to the OMB's directive to create a Y2K preparedness framework, by simply making a plan to make a plan, she said.

Panel members largely agreed. "As a government, we are falling short in implementation," said Raymond Kammer, director of NIST. "The policies are reasonable, but the big issue is getting the federal government to implement the procedures that are already there."

"Make it a requirement that people talk with NSA and NIST, not a recommendation," said the GAO's Keith Rhodes, when asked for recommendations to improve the government's information security execution. "People's aversion to ignoring standards developed by NSA has to be overcome."

Rhodes also emphasized the need for clear definitions of what constitutes data authentication and validation at a time when government is beginning to conduct more of its business online. But he questioned Morella's idea of creating an information security "czar" for the whole federal government, saying the job was too big for a single person, as well as important differences between computer security for civilian and national security agencies.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.