Y2K Czar Speaks Out

Washington insiders are starting to worry that their reputations--and not just the nation's computers--could be crippled by the notorious year 2000 software bug. That's one reason they're cheering the return of John A. Koskinen, who's been recruited by President Clinton and Vice President Al Gore to work out glitches in as many of the government's software programs as possible by the first Monday of the millennium, Jan. 3, 2000.

"This really could be a serious problem for the government and the world economy," Koskinen said during an interview on March 9, his first day as assistant to the President and chair of the President's Council on the Year 2000 Conversion.

Koskinen accepted the job last month after receiving calls from Clinton and Gore, ending his eight-month sojourn in the private sector. Koskinen left the Office of Management and Budget in July 1997, after a three-year stint as deputy director for management.

Industry executives grimly predict the federal repair job won't be done in time and will spill over the budget of $4.7 billion, even if the government ignores the tens of thousands of minor computer systems, computerized elevators and the heating and security systems that, too, could go haywire.

"Koskinen is facing up to what they should have done a year ago," said Rep. Steve Horn, R-Calif., chairman of the House Government Reform and Oversight Committee's Government Management, Information and Technology Subcommittee. Horn recently graded the agencies' repair efforts, awarding only three of them an A and six a B. He gave out four C's, six D's and five F's.

Last year, both Horn and Rep. Constance A. Morella, R-Md., chairwoman of the House Science Technology Subcommittee, called on Gore to lead the upgrade effort, partly because of his high-tech resume. However, Gore has kept his distance from the problem--at least publicly. He couldn't take the job, because "you need to have someone focused on this issue only," said Koskinen. But he said Gore--who's gearing up for the presidential primaries in early 2000--is still involved.

"In my conversations with people on the Hill . . . their first point is that everybody will be in the sinking ship together and it will be small consolation. . . if one particular passenger on that boat has more blame than another," said Koskinen.

That still leaves plenty of room for finger-pointing. "When we get down to the last six months, and problems start to pop up, there will be more of a tendency for people to start running around in circles making noise," Koskinen said.

So, why did Koskinen accept this next-to-impossible task? Being asked by the President and Vice President was one big reason, the love of a challenge was another, Koskinen said. Still, "you have to sort of be a masochist," he admitted. After all, as Koskinen readily acknowledges, he'll be left holding the bag if the software fails, but he won't get much credit if the snags are smoothed and Jan. 3 passes uneventfully: "It is one of the world's great bag-holder positions."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.