Results Act: Long Hot Summer

Agencies consulting with Congress on their Government Performance and Results strategic plans are in for a hot summer.

Hard on the heels of a tough assessment of agency plans by the Congressional Institute comes a joint Senate hearing next week designed to examine "why executive branch agencies are having difficulty meeting their responsibilities under the act."

Office of Management and Budget Director Franklin Raines and Acting Comptroller General James Hinchman will appear before the Senate Governmental Affairs and Appropriations Committees on June 24.

Congressional crankiness about GPRA consultations has been met by OMB caution. Lawmakers and the Clinton administration have been carrying on a war of letters all year about how much agencies need to tell legislators about their strategic plans how soon and what to do when members of Congress don't like what they see.

Congress wanted agencies to explain any instance when they failed to incorporate or answer a legislator's objection to part of their plan. But in an April 14 memorandum, Raines told agencies that "explanations may appropriately be limited to significant issues or differences and need not be offered for every contrary view."

In the end, agencies appear to be caught between the OMB rock and a congressional hard place on GPRA consultations. If the best they can expect is to be beaten up in both forums, at least they won't be alone. To seek solace and solidarity, those responsible for GPRA planning might consider joining one of 16 interagency GPRA groups newly listed on the National Performance Review's Managing for Results Web site:

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.