Privatization: What Works

The chairman of a congressional panel that is targeting government programs for privatization launched the panel's review this month with a study of privatization in state and local governments.

Rep. Scott Klug, R-Wis., head of the House Republican Task Force on Privatization, asked the General Accounting Office to look at lessons learned by state and local governments in their privatization efforts.

Klug is still recruiting members for the task force. A Klug spokeswoman said the panel is expected to begin meeting during this session of Congress.

GAO identified six lessons learned in a review of privatization in Georgia, Massachusetts, Michigan, New York, Virginia and the city of Indianapolis. The most important component of successful privatization is a political leader who champions it, GAO found.

"Political leaders should anticipate a need to develop and communicate a privatization philosophy and to garner public, business and political support," the report said.

In Indianapolis, the mayor was the political champion. He found that leaders have to be flexible to address the concerns of employees and affected citizens. When employee unions initially opposed the mayor's privatization initiatives, he involved them in the planning process. Working together, city and union officials moved from pure privatization to managed competition, allowing city employees the opportunity to compete for contracts with private firms.

"Competition in the marketplace rather than privatization per se produced the most value for taxpayers," Indianapolis officials told GAO. Allowing government agencies to compete with private companies reduced costs, improved service and improved employee morale, officials reported.

The other five lessons GAO identified were:

  • Establish an organizational and analytical structure to ensure effective implementation. Governmentwide commissions were the most often-used method to identify privatization opportunities and set privatization policy.
  • Enact legislative changes and/or reduce governmental resources to encourage greater use of privatization. Such changes include eliminating civil service protections and cutting budgets.
  • Use reliable cost data on government activities to support informed privatization decisions and to assess overall performance. Indianapolis used activity-based costing to figure out how much it cost the government to provide services.
  • Develop strategies to manage workforce transition. Involving employees in the planning process, retraining displaced workers and offering buyouts and job placement assistance helped alleviate employee worries about their futures.
  • Develop more sophisiticated methods of monitoring and oversight, to protect government's interests when its role in the delivery of services is reduced. Because contracting out was the most commonly-used method of privatization, contract audits and performance monitoring helped governments maintain control over the services contractors assumed.
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.