Panel: U.S. Can't Keep a Secret

letters@govexec.com

The best way for the federal government to protect national security secrets is to reduce the amount of information it classifies, a bipartisan commission reported yesterday.

The Commission on Protecting and Reducing Government Secrecy, led by Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan, D-N.Y., and Rep. Larry Combest, R-Texas, concluded that "secrets can be protected more effectively if secrecy is reduced overall."

The commission's study found that leaks of classified information are now "almost routine," so that the public and people within the government do not trust the present classification and personnel security systems. "Benefits can flow from moving information that no longer needs protection out of the classification system and, in appropriate cases, from not classifying at all," the report said.

Calling for legislation to set secrecy statutes, the commission said that "secrets in the federal government are whatever anyone with a stamp decides to stamp secret."

The commission made the following recommendations:

  • Classifying information should be kept to an absolute minimum, used only when national security interests are clearly at stake.
  • Just as the President should establish procedures for classifying information, he should also establish procedures for declassifying information.
  • If there is significant doubt whether information should be classified, then it should not be classified.
  • Unless the risk is too great, information should be declassified after ten years. All information should be declassified after 30 years, unless it would do an individual or the government serious harm to disclose it.
  • A National Declassification Center should be established.
Criticizing personnel clearance measures as still being based on the fear of Communist subversion, the commission said federal employees with security clearances should be more routinely scrutinized, because most security breaches are made by employees who receive clearances and later in their careers decide to commit espionage.

The committee also recommended eliminating interviews with neighbors and friends of employees and allowing employees with a certain level of security clearance to transfer to another agency at the same level without additional background checks.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.