INS Automation Blasted

February 27, 1997

INS Automation Blasted

The Immigration and Naturalization Service's $2.2 billion automation of many of its major functions is up to two years behind schedule and its managers have no idea if the automation is within cost limits, the Justice Department's inspector general told Congress yesterday.

Inspector General Michael Bromwich told the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, State and Judiciary that INS project managers lack "definitive measures" to track if their various automation projects are on schedule.

While praising two of INS's initiatives, a motion sensor project on the U.S.-Mexico border and a system that tracks refugees, Bromwich criticized three of the largest programs: a fingerprint identification system, an automated system to process illegal immigrants, and "Inspass," an airport immigration inspection system to allow frequent low-risk travelers to bypass lengthy inspection procedures.

An INS spokesman told The New York Times that the agency is having difficulties with some of the projects, but said much of that has to do with increases in the level of immigration that it must monitor. The INS estimates it now deals with 5 million illegal immigrants living in the United States and another 275,000 a year crossing the border or overstaying their visas. The spokesman said INS is working to get the behind-schedule programs back on track.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.