Appointment with Reform

The presidential appointment process is too slow, overly intrusive, excessively complex and must be reformed to restore integrity to the political process, a new report concludes.

The Twentieth Century Fund, a nonprofit, nonpartisan endowment that studies public policy, conducted a task force study of both the administration's selection process and the Senate's confirmation process. The task force, headed by former U.S. Senators John Culver, D-Iowa, and Charles Mathias, R-Md., concluded that the appointment process has become an "obstacle course," weakening the government's ability to attract highly qualified people to top level positions in the federal bureaucracy. Potential candidates do not want to put themselves through the costly and exhausting public scrutiny that now accompanies many political appointments.

"We all lose out when the structure no longer serves the public," Mathias said. "What could be worse for the democratic process than a system that discourages highly qualified people from public service and casts doubt on government's ability to function?"

The task force recommended several reforms:

  • Change the Senate confirmation process. Filibusters should not be allowed during confirmation debates on executive branch appointments. Lower-level non-controversial appointees should have their hearings waived. To protect the privacy of nominees, hearings should be closed when personal issues are discussed.
  • Reduce the number of presidential appointments. Almost 3,500 positions are now appointed by the president, and over 1,000 of those are subject to Senate confirmation. The task force recommended reducing the total number of appointments by one-third.
  • Expedite recruitment and nomination procedures. Presidential candidates should begin planning their staff during the campaign season. FBI investigations should be limited and the application process should be streamlined.
  • Be less hostile, more civil. Task force members said they were appalled by the aggressive and intrusive public probes into the lives of some nominees.
The report noted how long it now takes to fill some positions--it took President Bush a year to fill the position of commissioner at the Food and Drug Administration and nearly two years to assign a director to the Office of Energy Research.

One task force member, the Brookings Institution's Constance Horner, cautioned against closing off any of the confirmation process.

"I do not agree with the report's premise that there is or should be an inviolable 'zone of privacy' for nominees," Horner wrote. "From time to time, participants in the process have abused and maligned potential appointees. However, responsible inquiries into character have also identified serious evidence of unfitness to serve."

Richard C. Leone, president of the Twentieth Century Fund, said, "If we expect the best and brightest to agree to fill the role of public servant, the very least we should agree to do is treat them with a bit of decency."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.