Partnership Failure

October 8, 1996

Partnership Failure

A labor-management partnership at the U.S. Information Agency ended last week when the union announced it was withdrawing from the partnership agreement.

The American Federation of Government Employees Local 1812, which represents over 3,000 USIA employees, ended a three-year attempt between agency management and the union to share in the decision making process.

Union officials said the partnership agreement's provision to include their input before major decisions are made at USIA has been consistently ignored.

"The basic response has been that they don't want to include us," John Anderegg, the union chapter's treasurer, said.

Management officials said that they have tried to include the union but are not willing to share core management functions with them.

"Partnership is not co-management," Joanne Clifton, USIA's deputy associate director for management, said. "We can't say we're going to give them co-management."

USIA, the AFGE chapter, and the American Foreign Service Association chapter at the agency, formed a labor-management partnership council in December, 1993. The council did several reports on workplace issues, like telecommuting, which both sides consider successes of the partnership. But the process of deciding staff reductions at the agency angered AFGE officials, who said they were excluded despite the partnership agreement. Management officials admit making some mistakes in the process, but said that they tried to include the union.

"When we first went through reductions in '96, we should have had the information out to the joint partnership council earlier," Clifton said, adding that they lost a lot of time to the furloughs and snowstorms at the beginning of the year. "But this is new ground for everybody."

In June AFGE asked to take part in meetings of USIA's Resource Management Committee, which makes recommendations to the agency's director on budget issues. Director Joseph Duffey responded two months later, rejecting the request. Clifton said that the labor-management partnership council can create a set of recommendations that the director would review at the same time it reviews the resource committee recommendations. She said the agency allowed the union the same information that was available to the resource committee.

Anderegg said the debate over the union's role in the partnership came to a head in August when the Arts America program was eliminated without their input.

"There's a certain element of disrespect here," Anderegg said.

Anderegg said management dodges the union every time it pushes to be involved and that responses to union requests, particularly from director Duffey, are "wishy-washy."

"To use the word concrete in the same sentence as Mr. Duffey is impossible," Anderegg said.

Clifton said the union has always publicly viewed its relationship with the agency as confrontational. She said it was disappointing that the union was not willing to hang in through the rough times. "We need to make sure this is just a rest stop on the path to partnership," Clifton said. "I'm not willing to say it's over."

Anderegg said the union will wait to see if a new set of political appointees in the next administration is more committed to labor-management partnership.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.