Promising Practices Promising PracticesPromising Practices
A forum for government's best ideas and most innovative leaders.

Strategic Planning: Are Agencies Set Up to Fail?


Most federal leaders understandably focus on the important work of meeting public needs in the here and now. To the extent they consider the future, few look beyond the five-year Government Performance and Results Act time-horizon.

In focusing on today’s needs, it is easy to lose sight of the longer term. As baseball Hall of Famer Yogi Berra once said, “The future ain’t what it used to be.” Given our nation’s long-term fiscal challenges, agencies in 10 to 15 years will be lucky if their budgets are flat, if not declining. The baby boomers will have retired in mass—decreasing institutional knowledge and increasing human service agencies’ workloads. New technologies will have to be adopted quicker. And the public will expect services to be delivered in new and innovative ways. These trends are having some impact today, but they will be a much bigger force a decade from now.

By focusing so much on immediate demands, the federal government is woefully unprepared for the future. It’s time to strike a more appropriate balance. While current operations must remain a priority, agencies must institutionalize long-term planning to make sure issues critical to future mission performance are addressed.

It is time to give priority to disciplined long-range strategic visioning and planning at each agency. Five-year GPRA plans are not enough. We need to actively steer the future into the present by focusing on a period of at least a decade, if not two.

There are important precedents agencies can build on. The nation’s defense and intelligence agencies, for example, have been doing high-quality long-range strategic planning for decades.  A few civilian agencies—including the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Veterans Affairs Department—also have begun to embrace the importance of systematic long-range planning. The National Academy of Public Administration learned about these efforts when assisting the Social Security Administration in developing a long-range vision and high-level strategic plan (the Academy’s panel report, issued in July, is available at

Individual agencies must beef up long-term planning, but an integrated, governmentwide effort also is necessary to have the greatest impact. A new long-range strategic vision and planning team that can provide expert assistance in planning and ensure coordination across agencies should be established in the Executive Office of the President. Exactly what this Executive Office capacity might look like and how it might operate will require careful consideration and learning by doing.

Congress also has a critical role in fostering an environment in which federal agencies can prepare for the future. It can require agency leaders—in cooperation with stakeholders—to identify probable futures, develop a vision and produce a road map for transformation. Such actions will instill confidence that serious thinking about the future is under way while enhancing discussions with congressional leaders over current budget and policy issues.  

The world is changing rapidly and profoundly, threatening the federal government’s ability to perform important public missions. It is critical that agencies undertake the long-range planning needed to identify and implement often complex changes in time to meet future demands. But preparing for the future cannot be left to the isolated efforts of individual agencies. The White House must take actions to encourage and support long-range planning across government.

Dan Blair is president and CEO of the National Academy of Public Administration.

(Image via Thinglass/

Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.