Promising Practices Promising PracticesPromising Practices
A forum for government's best ideas and most innovative leaders.

Happy Birthday, America. Now What About National Preparedness?

Flickr user vaxzine

The Federal Emergency Management Agency’s National Preparedness Goal outlines how local, state, tribal and federal partners, as well as nongovernmental partners should aim to achieve “a secure and resilient nation with the capabilities required across the whole community to prevent, protect against, mitigate, respond to, and recover from the threats and hazards that pose the greatest risk.” There are a few key success factors to building a collaborative multidisciplinary, multijurisdictional homeland security framework, as well as a few consequences of not operating this way.

Institutionalizing coordination. Homeland security and public safety agencies often have limited manpower and limited time to dedicate to making coordination a part of daily business at all experience levels of an agency (not just senior management officials). Everyone benefits when leaders ensure that all staff have an appropriate cross-discipline, cross-jurisdictional lens. It may seem like an “extra” phone call or meeting, but in the long run it saves time in building capacity for planning and operations.

Partnership-building among organizations versus individuals. The value of relationship-building is key to the homeland security field, but it is often viewed as part of the “softer side,” or an indirect positive outcome of the years put in by senior management. Relationships are often on a one-to-one basis, versus an entire organization. This can be limiting as time goes on and leaders retire while the junior management staff is learning the value of crucial relationships. If relationship-building becomes a formal part of professional development in this field, it will serve everyone and serve incident response. Strong organizational relationships are lauded as one of the key success factors in the Pentagon 9/11 response. 

Understanding how diverse emergency support functions make the entire system stronger. From emergency management to law enforcement to fire and rescue to public health to hospitals to public safety communications—there is a common mission, but very distinct roles are needed to meet this mission. The cross-pollination of knowledge—as in “What can you help me with when %&$! hits the fan?” and “Did you know I can help you with [insert situational awareness, traffic management, security detail, analysis of symptoms, 50 cots, pediatric IVs, etc.] when %&$! hits the fan?”—strengthens the seams of response and ultimately enhances safety across our communities.

The following consequences may be on the horizon when these golden rules are not in play:

  • Operational plans, policies and procedures at some agencies may not be in alignment with other agencies, which may impact a large-scale response.
  • Key partners may not be aware of projects, updates and opportunities that could support their mission.
  • Agencies may miss out on opportunities to achieve more with less resources by working together to tackle common issues.
  • Partners are sometimes forgetful or are hesitant to engage colleagues from other disciplines or emergency support functions if they are not 100 percent clear about how they can help.

What success factors do you think are most important for achieving our National Preparedness Goal?

Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.