Promising Practices Promising PracticesPromising Practices
A forum for government's best ideas and most innovative leaders.

4 Ways to Improve Accountability in Your Office


Q: I am trying to figure out how to address accountability in my office. In the Culture Climate Survey, staff identified accountability of leadership as an issue. In the past, leaders either avoided problems or tried to address them after they became far too serious. This is a very sensitive issue because when leaders are held accountable, it is often done in private. Every now and then, often when it is too late, a leader is transferred to another office or agency. How do we assure our staff that their leaders are being held accountable beyond posting office values on the walls and without exposing the details of what’s being done?—Anonymous

Thank you for emailing me your question! Accountability is in the news for many reasons. From low scores in the Climate Culture Survey to the resignation of Veterans Affairs Department Secretary Eric Shinseki, accountability is a hot topic in Washington. In this age of austerity, “accountability” (or the lack thereof) is the word most commonly used when something has gone poorly.

Organizationally, troops on the front line commonly are held accountable, often in a way in which their colleagues know about it. But are leaders held accountable? Sometimes actions like the resignation of Shinseki are high profile and easily observed. But in other instances, measures taken in the name of accountability are behind closed doors or not seen by the troops. How can the troops know that leaders are being held accountable instead of being let off the hook?

Accountability has two components. One involves blame. When something goes wrong, the public, politicians, leaders and managers want to hold someone accountable by punishing the guilty. In other words, accountability occurs after the fact.

The other component of accountability involves responsibility, leadership and engagement. It is an attitude that people adopt because they believe what they do creates value for others, and therefore they take responsibility for organizational outcomes. They perceive that leaders support their efforts by helping them remove barriers impeding the mission. People also perceive that they have reasonable influence over the evaluation of their work and that the rewards and consequences are fair. In such an environment people choose to be accountable.

If accountability, especially for senior management, is viewed as an issue in your office then what can you do improve it?  Here are four suggestions:

  1. Formulate the real problem. I suspect accountability concerns represent an indicator or symptom of a bigger issue or set of issues. Calls for accountability are like canaries in a coal mine. They are indicators of a pervasive problem, such as lousy leadership, a corrupt culture or organizational pathologies. It would be quite rare for an organization to score highly on all dimensions of the Culture Climate Survey except for accountability.  From your question, it sounds like you may have stepped into a role that involved some leadership problems in the past and you are trying to turn the workforce’s expectations around. Dig into the organization’s history so you understand the path it took to arrive at its current state.

  1. Demonstrate your credible commitment to a leadership approach that differs from the past. A credible commitment is one in which you put something valuable, like your reputation, on the line. If you want people to engage and accept personal responsibility then you must do the same in a public way. You must take responsibility for what your team has done poorly or a project that has not gone well. When you take full responsibility, you can then investigate why things happened and work with your team to take steps to make sure the situation does not happen again. Of course, if good things have happened you want to celebrate the team and give employees full credit to demonstrate how you are supporting them.

  1. Set clear expectations for individuals and the organization. If expectations are understood across the organization, then it becomes easier for people to be accountable. Such broad understanding puts their reputation at stake. All too often, leaders incorrectly assume people know what they should be doing. Even if people know what they should be doing, changing demands, short-term pressures and firefighting can cause individuals and groups to quickly lose focus and drift. Set expectations and keep everyone focused.

  1. If employees consistently fail to deliver and accept accountability, help them find a situation in which they can commit. That may mean changing responsibilities in their current job, and other times it may mean helping them seek out opportunities in other organizations. In proposing the latter, do so respectfully and consistently, irrespective of a person’s position.

A workforce that chooses to be accountable likely will respond favorably to climate culture surveys.

Duce a mente
(May you lead by thinking)

Jackson Nickerson is the Frahm Family Professor of Organization and Strategy at the Olin Business School at Washington University in St. Louis, the Associate Dean and Director of the Brookings Executive Education, and a Senior Scholar in Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution. An award winning researcher and teacher, Jackson specializes in leadership, strategic and critical thinking, leading change, and innovation. While in a prior life he worked for NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, he now advises government agencies, not-for profits, and for-profit businesses on ways to improve performance. He is the author of Leading Change in a Web 2.1 World.

Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.