Promising Practices Promising PracticesPromising Practices
A forum for government's best ideas and most innovative leaders.

Ask EIG: How Do You Create a Culture That Values Diversity?

ARCHIVES



Ask EIG is a partnership between Government Executive and the management experts at Brookings Executive Education.

Dear EIG,

How do you create an organization culture that values diversity and inclusion?

-Anonymous

The phrase “diversity and inclusion” evokes emotional responses from many corners.  Passionate supporters tout diversity and inclusion as a moral imperative or as the new source of competitive advantage for every organization that adopt it.  From other corners, ardent opponents view diversity and inclusion as a manipulation to enact hiring quotas, increase organizational costs, and impose cultural and moral values that conflict with their own as a condition of employment.  But, there is another way to look at this call for action without eliciting emotions from any of these corners.   

(HAVE A QUESTION? Send your management questions to AskEIG@govexec.com.)

Describing the difference between “buy-in” and “bee-in” can illuminate the central leadership idea behind the call for diversity and inclusion.  Buy-in is a common phrase that most of us often use in the work place—“Hey Carolyn, we need your buy-in to implement this new program.”  The phrase initially seems innocuous as we are asking for help to do something work related. 

Yet from a different perspective, buy-in can imply that we excluded Carolyn from the decision-making process and, by implication, viewed her potential contributions as not valuable enough to arrant including her from the beginning.  Now, with the decision made, Carolyn is like a cog in the machine and we need her to move in order to implement what we already decided.  Buy-in communicates that we want Carolyn to “purchase” our decision even though it may come at a high emotional and personal cost to her.

Seeking buy-in is a common approach in organizations with political, command and control, and compliance-based structures.  To be clear, sometimes these organizational structures that rely on power are necessary for making decisions efficiently.  For instance, command and control can be effective in certain military and others situations where quick decision-making is key to victory, success, or survival.  However, in an increasing number of organizational settings, hierarchical power-based structures no longer offer the most effective organizational approach to creating value.

Bee-in, which is an expression I coined a few years ago in several courses I teach at Brookings Executive Education (hence the name BEE), reflects a set of processes where all relevant actors are included from the beginning.  Such processes enable groups to collectively and comprehensively formulate challenges.  Then, groups develop comprehensive solutions.  Bee-in processes include all relevant stakeholders and appreciate the diversity of a team’s information, knowledge, experience, and perspectives.  As a result, these processes cause team members to own the challenge and increase the likelihood of successfully implementing the solution.

Seeking bee-in is a common approach found in many kinds of organizations.  For instance, team-based structures, autonomous work teams, agile development organizations, as well as many other types of organizations use bee-in processes to generate commitment and collaboration.  While bee-in processes can be time consuming especially in the early phases of formulating challenges, the time is not misspent.  In fact, the time investment builds trust and creates understanding, which are known to ultimately speed implementation efforts and dramatically increase the likelihood of great execution. 

You asked how to create a culture that values diversity and inclusion?  My belief is if you lead through bee-in processes with all your relevant stakeholders, you will make an important and substantial step toward achieving your goal.  When used consistently, these processes foster a culture of mutual respect as well as an appreciation for the information, knowledge, experience, and perspectives of all relevant stakeholders, which are the fundamental ingredients for valuing diversity and inclusion.

While I hope adopting bee-in approaches sounds attractive, sometimes adopting them can be difficult in federal agencies.  Some leaders more comfortable with a command and control approach to decision-making may want bee-in but inadvertently undermine it when they overrule group consensus without adequate conversation to explain why.  Political appointees with limited time windows to implement desired policies all too often resort to using power to get things done, which undermines bee-in.  And, underinvestment in training and development, especially with respect to cross training and leadership, may unnecessarily work against the adoption of bee-in processes as people have little practice or understanding of these processes.  In such instances, much effort and conversation are needed to coach and guide leaders in their decision-making processes so they understand both the short- and long-term implications of their leadership approach.

In my view, the ultimate goal of diversity and inclusion is the full engagement and utilization of employees and their capabilities.  For an organization to value diversity and inclusion, leaders must choose to adopt, invest in, and sustain “bee-in” decision making processes that build trust and create understanding.  Doing so consistently offers a way to achieve full engagement and utilization of all of your employees. 

Duce a mente (may you lead by thinking),

Jackson Nickerson

In partnership with Brookings Executive Education, Excellence in Government is now taking, and answering, your most difficult management questions. Send your questions to AskEIG@govexec.com.

Jackson Nickerson is the Frahm Family Professor of Organization and Strategy at the Olin Business School at Washington University in St. Louis, the Associate Dean and Director of the Brookings Executive Education, and a Senior Scholar in Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution. An award winning researcher and teacher, Jackson specializes in leadership, strategic and critical thinking, leading change, and innovation. While in a prior life he worked for NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, he now advises government agencies, not-for profits, and for-profit businesses on ways to improve performance. He is the author of Leading Change in a Web 2.1 World.

FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by Brocade

    Best of 2016 Federal Forum eBook

    Earlier this summer, Federal and tech industry leaders convened to talk security, machine learning, network modernization, DevOps, and much more at the 2016 Federal Forum. This eBook includes a useful summary highlighting the best content shared at the 2016 Federal Forum to help agencies modernize their network infrastructure.

    Download
  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    GBC Flash Poll Series: Merger & Acquisitions

    Download this GBC Flash Poll to learn more about federal perspectives on the impact of industry consolidation.

    Download
  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

    Download
  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

    Download
  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    A DevOps Roadmap for the Federal Government

    This GBC Report discusses how DevOps is steadily gaining traction among some of government's leading IT developers and agencies.

    Download
  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

    Download
  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

    Download
  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.

    Download
  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    Joint Enterprise Licensing Agreements

    Read this eBook to learn how defense agencies can achieve savings and efficiencies with an Enterprise Software Agreement.

    Download
  • Sponsored by Cloudera

    Government Forum Content Library

    Get all the essential resources needed for effective technology strategies in the federal landscape.

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.