Promising Practices Promising PracticesPromising Practices
A forum for government's best ideas and most innovative leaders.

The 3 Essential Things Great Leaders Understand

Image via Nopporn/

Last week I was invited to speak to an audience of Canadian government executives about leading in a world of change.  I’ve spoken a lot about performance and collaboration in past years, but never about leadership.  So this was an opportunity for me to reflect on my experiences and observations over my career.

Leadership can be a difficult topic about which to convey anything meaningful.  There is so much written about the topic and it either feels like conceptual theory or platitudes, or you wind up narrating personal war stories.  I’m no Tom Fox, who writes thoughtfully about this topic weekly for the Washington Post!

Leaders I Have Admired.  Over the years I have had lots of opportunity to meet, work for, or observe leaders that I admired:

  • Political leaders, like Comptroller General Elmer Staats, Vice President Al Gore, and President Clinton;
  • Military leaders like Colin Powell and Thad Allen;
  • Agency leaders who transformed their agencies, like IRS commissioner Charles Rossetti; OSHA administrator Joe Dear, and Veterans Health Administration undersecretary Kenneth Kizer;
  • Network leaders like Francis Collins (who led the decoding of the human genome), John Koskinen (who led the Y2K effort), and  Ed DeSeve (who led the implementation of the Recovery Act).

Observing Leaders From the IBM Center.  With more than a decade at the IBM Center, I’ve has a perch to see public sector leadership in action via our weekly radio interviews of senior government leaders, as well as via reports by leading academics on different kinds of organizational leaders – Defense secretary Robert Gates, NASA Administrators Dan Goldin, Sean O’Keefe, and Michael Griffin, and CDC’s AIDS pioneer Helene Gayle   – each of whom faced challenges that demanded them to be transformational leaders.

The IBM Center has also prepared dozens of reports on trends in public management challenges, and how leaders are responding to them successfully. For example, it has described how leaders grow to respond to changing environments – whether driven by policy, technology, demographics, or how work gets done.   It has also examined how leaders use different strategies -- such as collaborative networks, performance, analytics, and social media – to transform and lead their agencies.

My Three Key Elements of Leadership.  In distilling the IBM Center’s work and my personal observations about leadership, I focused my insights around three key elements:

  • Leadership is a personal commitment – it takes work.
  • Leadership involves building a team and processes within a governance structure.
  • What constitutes successful leadership will differ, depending on the context of the challenges being faced.

The Shift from Manager to Leader.  I will address each of the three elements in turn in future blog posts, but first, it is important to make the distinction between “leadership” and “management.”  These distinctions have been described by the well-known business writer, Michael Watkins, in a Harvard Business Review article, who says the differences are predominantly shifts in perspective and responsibility from:

  • specialist to generalist
  • analyst to integrator
  • tactician to strategist
  • bricklayer to architect
  • problem solver to agenda setter
  • warrior to diplomat – get things done at all costs, to thinking about future battles and need for alliances
  • supporting cast member to lead role

In the federal government, there are ECQs – executive core qualifications – for its career senior executives. They are a good starting point for understanding the characteristics of a leader.  But in some cases, the language may not be sharp enough.  For example, it refers to the need to be flexible and open to new information. . . but it doesn’t really get at the importance of being comfortable with ambiguity, and the lack of information!

But you don’t always get to choose between being a manager and being a leader.  You often have to do both, and the challenge is knowing how to balance your time between them.  The challenge is that the former is more comfortable, so many new leaders gravitate to that role. The necessary balance, however, often comes from experience – either yours, or by observing others.

Other Blog Posts That Will Be Coming in This Series:

  • Leadership: It’s a Personal Commitment (Part 2)
  • Leadership: It’s  Building a Team and Processes within a Governance Structure (Part 3)
  • Leadership: The Approach Depends on the Context (Part 4)  

Image via Nopporn/

John M. Kamensky is a Senior Research Fellow for the IBM Center for the Business of Government. He previously served as deputy director of Vice President Gore's National Partnership for Reinventing Government, a special assistant at the Office of Management and Budget, and as an assistant director at the Government Accountability Office. He is a fellow of the National Academy of Public Administration and received a Masters in Public Affairs from the Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas at Austin.

Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.