Promising Practices Promising PracticesPromising Practices
A forum for government's best ideas and most innovative leaders.

The Five WORST Places to Work in Government

Image via Igor Normann /

Last week, the Partnership for Public Service released their annual list of the Best Places to Work in the federal government. The index, which measures the performance of agencies as related to employee satisfaction and commitment, showed the largest drop in employee satisfaction since the measurements began in 2003.

“The declining job satisfaction levels across the federal government come during turbulent times,” says the report, noting the decline in satisfaction correlates with hiring slowdowns, buyouts, increased retirements, budget constraints and a two-and-a-half year pay freeze that runs until the spring of 2013.

The results were broken down by three major categories:

Below are the five worst large, mid-size and small agencies to work for in the federal government, according to the 2012 Best Places to Work index. All scores are out of a possible 100.

(RELATED: The Five Best Places to Work in Government)

Worst Five Small Agencies

  1. Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (32.7)
  2. Federal Maritime Commission (34.7)
  3. Federal Election Commission (46.5)
  4. Federal Housing Finance Agency (49.6)
  5. Millennium Challenge Corporation (53.8)

Worst Five Mid-Size Agencies

  1. Broadcasting Board of Governors (46.8)
  2. National Archives and Records Administration (47.4)
  3. Department of Housing and Urban Development (54.0)
  4. Securities and Exchange Commission (56.0)
  5. Department of Education (56.8)

Worst Five Large Agencies

  1. Department of Homeland Security (52.9)
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs (56.7)
  3. Department of Agriculture (tie) (57.4)
  4. Department of Labor (tie) (57.4)
  5. Office of the Secretary of Defense, Joint Staff, Defense Agencies, and Department of Defense Field Activities (59.9)

Read more about the dip in employee satisfaction and visit to see how your agency performed. 

Do you agree with the rankings? 

Mark Micheli is Special Projects Editor for Government Executive Media Group. He's the editor of Excellence in Government Online and contributes to GovExec, NextGov and Defense One. Previously, he worked on national security and emergency management issues with the US Treasury Department and the Department of Homeland Security. He's a graduate of the Coro Fellows Program in Public Affairs and studied at Drake University.

Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.