Promising Practices Promising PracticesPromising Practices
A forum for government's best ideas and most innovative leaders.

Leadership Don’ts from Presidential Debates

ARCHIVES
Credit: National Park Service

There’s a lot a leader can learn from the presidential debates--and it's mostly what not to do. Debates are a game of "not losing" and, as history shows, there are a lot of examples where men vying to lead the free world have "lost it." Relive the classic debate moments that best exemplify what not to do as a leader and heed the lessons they taught us:   

Everybody is deserving of your time.

Three seconds into this clip from the 1992 debate, George H.W. Bush famously appeared uncaring when he checked his watch before hearing from a women at a town hall event. Clinton drew a sharp contrast when he connected with the women by demonstrating that he did indeed feel her pain. 

Takeaway: No matter who it is, everybody you lead is deserving of your time and undivided attention. Don't make people who come to you with a question feel like they're bothering you. 

Never let them see you sweat.

In 1960, during the first ever televised debate, Richard Nixon famously looked tired and nervous next to John Kennedy. Under the heat of the studio lights, Nixon got sweaty and continually had to dab at his upper lip. 

Takeaway: Being sweaty is associated with nervousness or being unprepared. It distracts from your message. If you have to give a big presentation, wear clothes that breathe and make sure to drink lots of water to keep your core temperature down. If you're worried that people are noticing you sweat, they probably are. Invest in that clinical strength deodorant next time.  

Respect personal space. 

Al Gore had enough problems with people thinking he was stiff and a bit awkward during the 2000 presidential race. This odd moment at a town hall with George W. Bush didn't help. Gore infamously approached Bush while he was talking, perhaps in an attempt to intimidate the Texas Governor. With a nod of his head and a bemused "hello," Bush made Gore look foolish.

Takeaway: Invading a person's personal space is pretty much guaranteed to make anyone uncomfortable. Beyond that, acting overly aggressive never serves to advance your point--it'll make you look like a hot head...or a fool. 

Know what you're talking about.

If his troubles walking down stairs weren't bad enough, Gerald Ford made the electorate wonder if he had a command of the facts in his 1976 debate with Jimmy Carter when he asserted,  "There is no Soviet domination of Eastern Europe." Turns out the Soviets were pretty dominant in Eastern Europe and would be for quite some time. 

Takeaway: A leader doesn't need to know everything, but they need to have their fundamental facts straight. Nothing undercuts the legitimacy of a leader more than appearing to not know what's going on. 

Honor your commitments--and don't make excuses. 

John McCain made what many considered to be a gaffe before the debate even began. In 2008, when the fundamentals of the economy proved not all that strong, McCain tried to cancel a debate with Barack Obama, saying he needed to return to Washington to deal with the financial crisis. The result: his campaign appeared to be backing away from the debate and prompted questions about how McCain would handle multiple problems at once as president. 

Takeaway: Honor your commitments--even if other circumstances make it difficult. If you need to back away from a goal or commitment, don't make a lot of excuses.  

Be human. 

In his 1988 debate with George H.W. Bush, Michael Dukakis was notoriously asked how he would feel "If Kitty Dukakis were raped and murdered, would you favor an irrevocable death penalty for the killer?" He responded that he would not, citing his long-standing opposition to the death penalty. The next day the press painted Dukakis as uncaring and robotic, saying he should have been enraged by the idea--if not the very question itself.  

Takeaway: Leaders are human and they should have human responses to situations. Having a level head is important, but don't take stoicism and the burdens of leadership to the point where you're not relatable anymore.

What other lessons have you learned from watching the debates over the years? 

Follow Excellence in Government on Twitter | Facebook | Google + | LinkedIn

Mark Micheli is Special Projects Editor for Government Executive Media Group. He's the editor of Excellence in Government Online and contributes to GovExec, NextGov and Defense One. Previously, he worked on national security and emergency management issues with the US Treasury Department and the Department of Homeland Security. He's a graduate of the Coro Fellows Program in Public Affairs and studied at Drake University.

FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.