Promising Practices Promising PracticesPromising Practices
A forum for government's best ideas and most innovative leaders.

5 Tips for Watching the Debates

Flickr user Paul Chenoweth

Presidential debate season is upon us—and nobody is happier than media pundits. Given a license to speculate, the talking heads will prognosticate from now until the final debate ends. But the debates are about more than who wins and who loses. In a campaign season marked by a lack of specificity, the debates provide the best view yet of the plans each candidate has for dealing with a slew of very real issues.

The First Amendment Center at the Newseum recently hosted a panel entitled, “Beyond Wins & Losses: a Citizen’s Guide to the 2012 Presidential Debates.” The team of panelists offered a few tips for how you can watch the debates—and avoid fixating on the most trivial elements of the contest.

Watch With a Notebook.

When you sit down to watch the debate, have a notebook and pen at the ready. Take note of the issues that stand out to you and the “facts” that require follow up research. We'll get to good sources for research in a moment

Invite Friends Who Don’t Agree With You

Yes, those friends. Invite them over. Set some ground rules on civility (no punching, bottling, or biting) and invite people of differing political views to watch the debates. Don’t experience the debates with only those who agree with you—you’ll get more from the experience by discussing what you’ve just seen and heard with people who have a different perspective.

Try Listening, Not Watching

Conventional wisdom holds that those who listened to the Kennedy-Nixon debate felt Nixon came out on top while those who watched on TV felt Kennedy was the victor—in part because Kennedy looked better. Since the very first televised debate, the body language of each candidate has played an increasingly bigger role. Instead of focusing on superficial visual details, try listening to the debates on the radio.

When It’s Over, Turn It Off

When the debate is over, turn it off. Make up your own mind about who was best before being sucked into the spin, consensus, and “narrative” building that occurs in the post-debate analysis on TV. If you were crazy enough to invite your partisan friends over, discuss it after you’ve taken a few minutes to process your own thoughts.

Post-Debate Follow Up

If you’re confused when it’s all over and need help getting the facts straight, try visiting the websites of a few fact checking organizations. Each is different and some have a particular bias—try these five:

How are you planning to watch the debates?

Mark Micheli is Special Projects Editor for Government Executive Media Group. He's the editor of Excellence in Government Online and contributes to GovExec, NextGov and Defense One. Previously, he worked on national security and emergency management issues with the US Treasury Department and the Department of Homeland Security. He's a graduate of the Coro Fellows Program in Public Affairs and studied at Drake University.

Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.