Management Matters Management MattersManagement Matters
Practical advice for federal leaders on managing people, processes and projects.

The Path to Partnership 2.0

ARCHIVES

In 2009, President Obama signed an executive order, similar to one President Clinton signed in 1993, establishing governmentwide labor-management forums and promoting partnerships between federal employee groups and agency officials. Supporters of Clinton-era labor-management partnerships say they fostered greater cooperation, recognized the importance of input from employees and their union reps, and brought faster resolution of contract disputes and grievances. Detractors argue the process sometimes excluded middle managers from important discussions, required senior managers to relinquish too much power, and failed to hold managers accountable for implementing partnerships.

Labor-management partnerships fared better at some agencies than others. Most important to success was support from agency chiefs and union presidents. Top executives must be prepared to do whatever it takes to ensure chief human capital officers and labor relations specialists understand that partnership is a legitimate approach to labor-management relations. Union leaders also must foster acceptance among their contract negotiations staff. The peaks and pitfalls of establishing partnerships under Clinton's executive order yielded helpful guideposts.

Agree on the Mission

Labor and management officials must develop a shared understanding of what their partnership is trying to accomplish. Each side should integrate their priorities, such as accountability, which usually ranks high for management, and empowerment, typically a union bargaining imperative.

Get It in Writing

Draft a formal partnership agreement. Such agreements detail how labor-management processes will work at various levels in each division or function, and how they will foster communication and coordination across operating units. Officials should regard the agreement as a living document subject to periodic review and modification at least annually.

Limit Consultants

Employees often team up with outside consultants to provide their labor-management forums with startup guidance and training. But officials should rely on them only to develop in-house facilitators who can support ongoing partnership activities without external assistance.

Provide Multiple Forums

Productive partnerships require regular, ongoing and sometimes intense interactions in scheduled and structured labor-management forums. They also create platforms for episodic, impromptu and informal exchanges of information and practices, including face-to-face meetings, virtual networks or task teams.

Develop a Process for Input

Cultivate a common understanding of the process leading up to management decisions-what it entails, why it is in everyone's respective interests, what are the expectations, and what actions will occur after the process has concluded. Agencies should provide managers, employees, union officials and others substantive information and involvement before establishing policies or taking actions that affect the work environment. Management officials must provide information early enough to solicit direct, informed and credible input.

Break the Consensus Barrier

Consensus is neither necessary nor attainable on every labor-management issue. Adopt a strive-for-consensus approach. Forum participants should make good-faith efforts to reach agreements each side can live with and publicly support. But use other methods-voting or delegating to the forum chair-when consensus is jointly perceived to be unnecessary or unattainable.

Develop Partnering Skills

Participants in labor-management forums should receive training in interest-based problem-solving, consensus decision-making and collaborative bargaining. Agencies should foster partnering skills through programs for union stewards and managers. Interpersonal communication creates positive agency-union partnerships and relationships with stakeholders-all of which are vital to agency performance.

Hinda Sterling and Herb Selesnick, senior partners at Sterling & Selesnick Inc., were involved in implementing Clinton administration labor-management partnerships.

 
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.