Management Matters Management MattersManagement Matters
Practical advice for federal leaders on managing people, processes and projects.

Kicked to the Curb?


A leasing crisis looms at the Interior Department, the agency's inspector general warned in a recent report. More than 100 leases for building space are set to expire in June 2009, but the IG's office is worried that Interior might not get them renewed by then. "Some elements of DoI bureaus could find themselves having to vacate their premises," said the July report, ominously titled: "Absent Immediate Action, the Department of the Interior Faces Looming Leasing Crisis."

IG evaluators said the General Services Administration -- which reviews and in some cases controls leases for other federal agencies -- is slow and provides contradictory guidance that has leasing officials at Interior scratching their heads over how to make sure they have workspace for their employees. GSA must approve leasing arrangements, but the IG report said there's only one person at the agency to review new lease proposals from across the vast federal government.

MaryAnne Beatty, a spokeswoman for GSA's Public Buildings Service, said officials believe they're doing a good job overseeing Interior's lease requests. She provided a statement that said the agency has three full-time workers -- not just one -- reviewing leases. "This is a top priority for GSA," the statement said.

The conflict stems from a move by GSA to tighten control over building leases. In an October 2007 letter to agency heads, then-GSA administrator Lurita A. Doan announced that agencies could no longer arrange their own leases for spaces bigger than 19,999 square feet. Agencies would have to submit additional paperwork to justify smaller leases not arranged through GSA, she said. Officials could deny proposed leases if GSA had space available for them instead. Doan said the tighter rules were a response to audits by GSA's inspector general and the Government Accountability Office, which found agencies hadn't properly used their leasing authority.

Before 1996, GSA exercised strict control over leases, requiring many more of the government's rental agreements to go through the central agency. But that year, as part of the Clinton administration's push to decentralize control over many aspects of federal management, GSA announced that agencies could arrange their own leases if officials believed they could get a better deal themselves.

Leasing officials throughout the Interior Department are clearly chafing under GSA's renewed central control. Fish and Wildlife Service officials, for example, complained to the IG's evaluators that it took GSA more than three years to find them appropriate office space in Orlando, Fla.

The leasing issue between Interior and GSA illustrates a common problem in federal management: the control pendulum. In response to concerns about too much centralization, GSA decentralized leasing power in 1996. In response to concerns about too much decentralization, GSA re-centralized leasing power in 2007. Naturally, concerns about too much centralization have resurfaced. Federal property managers are riding the pendulum from side to side.


Brian Friel is founder of One Nation Analytics, an independent research, analytics and consulting firm for the federal market.

Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.