Management Matters Management MattersManagement Matters
Practical advice for federal leaders on managing people, processes and projects.

In Full View

ARCHIVES

In September 2007, the staff of the Katy Independent School District in Texas-which educates 55,000 children-spent $22,342.49 at pizzerias. The school district bought pizza 11 times, ranging from one order worth $22.96 to another totaling $7,983.75.

That's a lot of dough.

All that pizza might have gone to good purpose-motivation for good behavior, fundraisers for extracurricular activities, or maybe back-to-school festivities. If I were a homeowner in the school district, however, I would ask about the pizza purchases at the next school board meeting to make sure my property taxes were being spent wisely. But the only reason I would know about the pizza is because the Katy school district posts its monthly check registers online. Local citizens can view the amount of every check written by the district, as well as every check recipient. Such transparency could someday come to your federal agency. Spending hawks want managers at all levels of government to post all their contracts, checks and receipts online, for the world to see.

Katy is one of several dozen Texas school districts with online check registers. From Washington state to Oklahoma to Missouri, state governments have joined the transparency movement, too, opening their books to the public for scrutiny of tax expenditures. At the federal level, the Web site USAspending.gov provides summary information of government grants and contracts. Government groups across the political spectrum, from Public Citizen on the left to Americans for Tax Reform on the right, have joined the transparency movement. They want more detailed information about public finances posted on the Internet. The hope of spending hawks is that rising transparency will encourage honesty and thriftiness in the halls of government.

"People are used to going online and seeing their AmEx accounts," Americans for Tax Reform President Grover Norquist said at a May 15 event at the New America Foundation, a nonprofit public policy institute in Washington. "They're used to checking their UPS and FedEx material traveling across the country. They can see every check they write at their bank."

If people can track their own expenditures online, then why can't the government do the same? "I think at the federal level and the state level in the next 10 years, this is inevitable," Norquist said.

Detail is, of course, the key. On USAspending.gov, for example, I can see that the General Services Administration on Jan. 17 signed a $2.1 million contract with Ford Motor Co. for pickup trucks. But I can't tell from the information posted on the site how many trucks GSA bought, so I don't know whether the government got a good deal. The site does inform me that four bids were made for the pickup contract, so that suggests a good bargain might have been struck. Did the government get 100 trucks? That would be a great deal compared with the manufacturer's suggested retail price for 2008 Ford F-150s. Norquist advocates for posting the actual wording of contracts and grants "to see whether somebody's walking away with the cash."

Recently, several states have launched such public financial databases. The transparency movement is on a roll. The question for federal managers is, would you welcome the scrutiny?

Brian Friel covered management and human resources at Government Executive for six years and is now a National Journal staff correspondent.

 

Brian Friel is founder of One Nation Analytics, an independent research, analytics and consulting firm for the federal market.

FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.