Management Matters Management MattersManagement Matters
Practical advice for federal leaders on managing people, processes and projects.

Transition Management

ARCHIVES
Management is tough in the pressure cooker environment of a presidential transition when a president-elect works frantically to shift gears from campaigning to governing. Even experienced presidents facing a second term can stumble.

Yet failing to find room for management during this time can affect the success of a presidency far more than most people realize. Several critical steps can get the incoming administration off to a solid start.

1. Organize and manage with an effective transition team. Confusion and near-chaos characterize most transitions, seriously handicapping the president-elect in the urgent business of selecting his leadership team, modifying his predecessor's budget and formulating program and policy initiatives. A second-term transition-though clearly less disruptive-can present problems and missed opportunities, too.

Many regard Ronald Reagan's presidential transition as the best organized, largely because it was led by seasoned veterans such as Edwin Meese and Edwin Harper. Their effectiveness came in part because Meese had worked closely with Reagan when Reagan was governor of California. Harper had significant White House experience.

History points to the contrasting mismanaged national security transition between the Eisenhower and Kennedy administrations. Kennedy considered many of Eisenhower's national security processes cumbersome, and abandoned them before instituting more streamlined procedures some months into his presidency. This operational vacuum contributed to the Bay of Pigs fiasco and Kennedy's nuclear standoff with Russian Premier Nikita Khrushchev during the Cuban missile crisis. A well-managed national security transition would have been invaluable when the Cold War was at its peak.

Another management problem often arises when campaign officials without the background to be appointed to government positions are tapped to be transition liaisons with agencies. Despite limited knowledge or experience, they are sorely tempted to deplore the "terrible mess" they find, and perceive recalcitrant "career bureaucrats" as poised to undermine the new president. Many of these campaign members suggest that they could be of great service by "cleaning things up." The reality is they can quickly alienate the career service from the president before he even takes office.

2. Integrate management into planning the new president's program and policy initiatives. The launch of President Nixon's popular federal assistance programs under his New Federalism initiative illustrates the value of involving career executives heavily in the design of a major presidential policy initiative. The career staff in the Budget Bureau's Office of Executive Management initiated, designed and led the most comprehensive effort ever to streamline hundreds of cumbersome programs of federal assistance to state and local governments, in large part through major decentralization measures and greater reliance on decision-making by local communities.

On the other hand, the Clinton administration's ambitious health reform efforts might have gotten greater consideration had the president broadened transition planning to include those design features that were required to make a new health-care system workable.

3. Design and implement presidential reforms that improve government operations. Inexplicably, specific plans for presidential management initiatives often are deferred until after the inauguration. In-depth planning should begin during the campaign so initiatives can be launched quickly after the president takes office to improve the chances for success.

Nixon's New Federalism, which combined policy and management reforms, was a successful presidential initiative to improve government operations. Two months after inauguration, he directed agencies to take the most comprehensive actions ever on intergovernmental management. Agencies were required to submit progress reports on actions taken, not only plans to take action, just six weeks later.

By contrast, the Clinton administration's Reinventing Government initiative took the better part of a year just planning how to proceed. Most lower-level managers were still learning about the plans well into the second year, as was the case recently with the President's Management Agenda under George W. Bush. At a comparable point in Nixon's first term, thousands of communities across the nation already had benefited for nearly a year from several of his streamlining actions that slashed the time and funds involved in seeking approval of federal assistance, brought greater responsiveness to differing needs of individual communities and shifted determination of project details from federal to local authorities.

The next president faces important management challenges, including how much autonomy to give agencies in managing human resources and which staffing requirements should be governmentwide, how to improve the credibility of competitive sourcing and performance awards, and what new interagency and intergovernmental management steps to take to safeguard against terrorism.

One can hope that work is already well under way in the George Bush and John Kerry campaigns on transition planning and the major issues they want to address during their administrations. Whether Kerry will advance his own initiatives or Bush will regroup for a second phase of his management agenda, now is the time to start rather than waiting until Inauguration Day.

 
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

    View
  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

    View
  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

    View
  • GBC Issue Brief: The Future of 9-1-1

    A Look Into the Next Generation of Emergency Services

    View
  • GBC Survey Report: Securing the Perimeters

    A candid survey on cybersecurity in state and local governments

    View
  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.

    View
  • eBook: State & Local Cybersecurity

    CenturyLink is committed to helping state and local governments meet their cybersecurity challenges. Towards that end, CenturyLink commissioned a study from the Government Business Council that looked at the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of state and local leaders around the cybersecurity issue. The results were surprising in a number of ways. Learn more about their findings and the ways in which state and local governments can combat cybersecurity threats with this eBook.

    View

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.