Executive Coach Executive CoachExecutive Coach
Scott Eblin offers his take on lessons in the news and his advice on your pressing leadership questions.

3 Signs You Should Make Leadership Team Changes Sooner Rather Than Later

Recognizing when it's time to bring down the hammer. Recognizing when it's time to bring down the hammer. Image via schankz/Shutterstock.com

A few years ago I wrote a post called Three Reasons You Should Fire the Prima Donna. That one was about why leaders should be decisive in exiting high performing but totally disruptive members of their team. Consider this post the next level up companion to the Prima Donna post.

In the last couple of weeks, I’ve been in multiple conversations in which experienced senior leaders have discussed their lessons learned along the way. In every case, the leader said their biggest lesson learned was they should have made key changes in their senior leadership team sooner than they did.

That they all had the same big lesson is not that surprising to me. I’ve heard the same lesson dozens of times in 14 years of executive coaching. Heck, I had to learn the same lesson myself when I was an executive.

So why do so many senior leaders have to learn this lesson the hard way? Why do we wait so long to bring the hammer down? Because firing people is hard. As one of my senior executive colleagues said years ago, “If the prospect of firing people doesn’t keep you up at night, there’s something wrong with you.”

Still, especially if you’re a leader charged with making big changes, there will likely be times when you need to make changes in your leadership team. Here are three signs that tell you when you need to do that sooner rather than later:

Lack of Buy-In: When you’re leading a big change, there will usually be people on your leadership team that are enthusiastic about it and others that want no part of it. They aren’t bad people, it’s just that where you’re going is not what they signed up for. It’s not going to get better for anyone with time. When you recognize the resistance, have an adult to adult conversation about why a change is likely best for all concerned.

Lack of Performance: You likely weren’t named leader of the team because you’re expected to keep things exactly as they are. In all likelihood, you’re expected to raise the performance bar significantly. Some people on your team will do great with that; others won’t. You want to give people a chance to develop but you also have to be realistic about whether they’re going to meet the new performance standards in a reasonable period of time. If they can’t, it’s time to make a change.

Lack of Time: If you find yourself scrambling between strategic and tactical priorities on a regular basis that may be a sign that you need to make some leadership team changes. If that scrambling involves cleaning up after other people’s messes and other forms of remediation, that’s a pretty clear sign that you need to make changes. Like everyone else, you only have so much time in a week. If you find yourself spending a lot of time on things that really shouldn’t be on your plate, you need to make some changes in your leadership team.

What’s your take? Looking back on your own lessons learned, what are the signs that it’s time to make changes in your leadership team?

Image via schankz/Shutterstock.com

Executive coach Scott Eblin’s goal is to help you succeed at the next level of leadership. Throughout the week, he’ll offer his take on the leadership lessons in the news and his advice on your most pressing leadership questions. A former government executive, Scott is a graduate of Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government and is the author of The Next Level: What Insiders Know About Executive Success.

Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.