Executive Coach Executive CoachExecutive Coach
Scott Eblin offers his take on lessons in the news and his advice on your pressing leadership questions.

You Don’t Need to Solve for 100%


There’s a pattern I’m seeing lately.  Leaders are getting overwhelmed with the complexity of their jobs and throwing up their hands in despair.  As Daniel Kahneman explains in his book,Thinking, Fast and Slow, the human brain only has so much capacity for complex problem solving in any given moment before it shuts down.

As I talk with leaders, I hear a lot of stories about overwhelm and the perception that there’s not much that can be done about it.

Recently, for example, I found myself in a conversation with a management team that was feeling overwhelmed by all of the stuff that’s been added to their plate without anything coming off.

Earlier that same day, I was talking with an executive who recognized that he needs to take more regular time to step back and define what he’s really trying to do but couldn’t imagine how he was going to fit that into his schedule.

In a presentation to the Conference Board last month, I shared conclusions from analyzing the data from over 1,800 manager and executive self assessments on leadership behaviors that are important for success at the next level. (You can take the self assessment here.)  My basic headline was that most leaders are so busy doing stuff that they can’t see what needs to be done.

Sound like anyone you know (or seen in the mirror lately)?  It does to me and applies to me.

Here’s the conclusion I’ve come to  – you can’t solve for 100%.  The good news is you usually don’t need to solve for 100%.

Think about it.  Many of the problems we face as leaders today are so complex that it’s a waste of time to come up with a perfect solution at the front end anyway.  By the time you get to the 100thstep in your pre-determined problem solving sequence, the situation has changed and the later steps no longer apply.

So, if you’re not solving for 100%, what do you do instead?  Try solving for the next few steps or as much as you can reasonably get.   It’s rare in life that you go from zero to 100 in a short amount of time.  Progress is incremental.  What would a 5 or 10 percent improvement this week look like?  Take that and work with it.  Then go for another 5 to 10 percent improvement next week that will build on what you accomplished this week.  After a few weeks of that you’ll be closer to the 100% picture.

Where to start?  How about starting with the goal of taking five minutes at the beginning of the day and again at the middle of the day to breathe, clear your head and ask, “What am I really trying to accomplish over the next few hours?”

What have you learned about overcoming overwhelm?  What tactics and strategies work for you?

(Image via Laborant/Shutterstock.com)

Executive coach Scott Eblin’s goal is to help you succeed at the next level of leadership. Throughout the week, he’ll offer his take on the leadership lessons in the news and his advice on your most pressing leadership questions. A former government executive, Scott is a graduate of Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government and is the author of The Next Level: What Insiders Know About Executive Success.

Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.