Trump Reveals His Plan to Get Mexico to Pay For His Wall Plan

Flickr user Gage Skidmore

Donald Trump burst on the scene as a presidential candidate last summer with his call to stop illegal immigration by building a border wall with Mexico, and to have Mexico pay for it. In a memo to the Washington Post, the Republican frontrunner finally disclosed how he would force the US neighbor to pony up the money.

His plan? Extorting Mexico by cutting the massive flow of remittances that come into the country from the US, canceling visas, and increasing trade tariffs.

Immigration is a privilege, not a right,” Trump writes. “Mexico is totally dependent on the United States as a release valve for its own poverty—our approvals of hundreds of thousands of visas every year is one of our greatest leverage points.”

There are many problems with Trump’s plan. Among other things, it underestimates the costs of building the wall, rests on shaky legal ground, and, above all, could severely hurt both the US and Mexican economies. According to various estimates, up to 14 million American jobs depend on trade with the country.

Trump writes that he would alter a rule under the Patriot Act, designed to counter terrorism, to cut off some of the remittances Mexico gets every year from Mexicans living in the United States.

“Mexico will immediately protest. They receive approximately $24 billion a year in remittances from Mexican nationals working in the United States. The majority of that amount comes from illegal aliens. It serves as de facto welfare for poor families in Mexico,” Trump writes. In 2014, remittances to Mexico surpassed foreign direct investment, while in 2015, they surpassed income from oil, coming to a $24.8 billion total,with $23.7 billion coming from the US.

If Mexico made a one-time payment of $5-10 billion, Trump says his administration would allow it to continue receiving remittances.

Such a change to the Patriot Act—specifically altering section 326, which requires finance companies to ask for ID from their customers, so that it includes wire transfer companies—would surely spark massive lawsuits from civil liberties groups and companies like Western Union.

Moreover, a wall may not cost the $8 billion that Trump estimates, but closer to $15 billion to $25 billion, according to MPI, as Quartz pointed out when Trump first outlined his plan.

And, as the Post points out that it is very difficult to track how much of the remittances come from undocumented immigrants. Draining Mexico of that income would drastically hurt the country’s poor, and ironically might trigger more undocumented immigration into the United States.

Based on past remarks, Mexico’s leaders are unlikely to welcome Trump’s proposal.

(Image via Flickr user Gage Skidmore)

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • GBC Issue Brief: The Future of 9-1-1

    A Look Into the Next Generation of Emergency Services

  • GBC Survey Report: Securing the Perimeters

    A candid survey on cybersecurity in state and local governments

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.

  • eBook: State & Local Cybersecurity

    CenturyLink is committed to helping state and local governments meet their cybersecurity challenges. Towards that end, CenturyLink commissioned a study from the Government Business Council that looked at the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of state and local leaders around the cybersecurity issue. The results were surprising in a number of ways. Learn more about their findings and the ways in which state and local governments can combat cybersecurity threats with this eBook.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.