Evan Vucci/AP

Obama to GOP Rivals on Refugees: Listen to George W. Bush

The president said calls to exclude Muslim refugees or only include Christians were “shameful.”

On Monday morn­ing, Pres­id­ent Obama com­pli­men­ted an un­likely for­eign policy strategist—former Pres­id­ent George W. Bush.

Speak­ing at the G20 Sum­mit in An­t­a­lya, Tur­key, Obama cri­ti­cized Re­pub­lic­ans who sug­gest that the United States ac­cept only Chris­ti­an refugees from the con­flict in Syr­ia.  

“When I hear folks say that, ‘Well, maybe we should just ad­mit the Chris­ti­ans, but not the Muslims’—when I hear polit­ic­al lead­ers sug­gest­ing that there would be a re­li­gious test for which per­son who’s flee­ing from a war-torn coun­try is ad­mit­ted—when some of those folks them­selves come from fam­il­ies who be­nefited from pro­tec­tion when they were flee­ing polit­ic­al per­se­cu­tion, that’s shame­ful,” the pres­id­ent told re­port­ers. “That’s not Amer­ic­an.”

“I had a lot of dis­agree­ments with George W. Bush on policy, but I was very proud after 9/11 when he was adam­ant and clear about the fact that this is not a war on Is­lam,” Obama con­tin­ued, not­ing that cur­rent Re­pub­lic­an lead­ers should fol­low his ex­ample.

The pres­id­ent’s re­marks came on the heels of an at­tack on Par­is on Fri­day, which left more than 120 dead. In the days that fol­lowed, much of the de­bate fo­cused on how the United States should com­bat IS­IS, as well as U.S. refugee policy.

On Sunday, pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate Jeb Bush ar­gued that the United States should “fo­cus our ef­forts as it relates to refugees on the Chris­ti­ans that are be­ing slaughtered.” His com­pet­it­or, Sen. Ted Cruz, offered that there is “no mean­ing­ful risk of Chris­ti­ans com­mit­ting acts of ter­ror.”   

Obama de­fen­ded the Amer­ica’s cur­rent mil­it­ary coun­terter­ror­ism strategy.

“What’s been in­ter­est­ing is, in the af­ter­math of Par­is, as I listen to those who sug­gest something else needs to be done, typ­ic­ally the things they sug­gest need to be done are things we are already do­ing,” the pres­id­ent said.

The “one ex­cep­tion” to that, the pres­id­ent said, is the sug­ges­tion “that we should put large num­bers of U.S. troops on the ground.” Obama ob­jec­ted, say­ing that would be “a mis­take.” Without the sup­port of the loc­al pop­u­la­tion, he ar­gued, the Is­lam­ic State would simply re­sur­face.  

“And let’s as­sume that we were to send 50,000 troops in­to Syr­ia, what hap­pens when there is a ter­ror­ist at­tack gen­er­ated from Ye­men? Do we then send more troops in­to there? Or Libya, per­haps? Or if there’s a ter­ror­ist net­work op­er­at­ing any­where else in North Africa or in South­east Asia?”

The pres­id­ent struck back against crit­ics who ar­gued he has not been do­ing enough on the battle against IS­IS, stat­ing that he would not “take ac­tions either be­cause it is go­ing to work polit­ic­ally or it is go­ing to some­how in the ab­stract make Amer­ica look tough.”

“And maybe part of the reas­on is be­cause every few months I go to Wal­ter Reed, and I see a 25-year-old kid who’s para­lyzed or has lost his limbs,” the pres­id­ent said. “And some of those are people I’ve ordered in­to battle. And so I can’t af­ford to play some of the polit­ic­al games that oth­ers may.”

“Some of them seem to think if I was just more bel­li­cose in ex­press­ing what we’re do­ing, that that would make a dif­fer­ence,” Obama said. “Be­cause that seems to be the only thing that they’re do­ing—is talk­ing as if they’re tough.”