An Unauthorized Leak on Unauthorized 'Zero Dark Thirty' Remarks?

Zero Dark Thirty was nominated for five Academy Awards. Zero Dark Thirty was nominated for five Academy Awards. Columbia Pictures

The tangled tale of how former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta in 2011 may have inadvertently disclosed classified information took a new turn this week with a complaint that a longtime whistleblower ombudsman now working for the intelligence community inappropriately shared a document with Congress.

Dan Meyer, who spent years at the Defense Department Inspector General’s Office but moved in July 2013 to handle whistleblower issues for the intelligence community inspector general, has been accused by his former agency of giving the Senate Armed Services and Intelligence committees what was officially termed a “pre-decisional working draft” of a report on how Panetta and Defense Department Undersecretary for Intelligence Michael Vickers handled the making of the film “Zero Dark Thirty.”

As reported March 25 by journalist Adam Zagorin at the nonprofit Project on Government Oversight, the Pentagon watchdog’s office “has asserted that, in giving the unclassified report to Congress, Dan Meyer, who now holds a sensitive post in the intelligence community, made an ‘unauthorized disclosure.’ ” Zagorin attributed this information to a document obtained by the Project On Government Oversight and to “people familiar with the matter.”

Meyer, according to reporting by Government Executive, says the disclosure was part of his job.

The story dates back to POGO’s disclosure in June 2013 that Panetta, who left the Defense Department in February 2013, was being investigated for remarks made when he was CIA director in June 2011. At an awards ceremony in Langley, Va., honoring the SEAL team that took out Osama bin Laden, Panetta is said to have mentioned the name of a key SEAL in the presence of Hollywood screenwriter Mark Boal, who wrote “The Hurt Locker” and later “Zero Dark Thirty” about the bin Laden raid.

The Pentagon IG, however, delayed release of the report -- a copy of which was obtained by POGO -- and which had been requested by then-House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Peter King, R-N.Y. In December 2012, a copy was given to the congressional panels “that had the potential to embarrass the Secretary of Defense,” POGO recently wrote. “And it spelled trouble for the IG…because it showed that the IG had been sitting on politically sensitive information.”

Then-acting DoD IG Lynne Halbrooks subsequently released an unclassified version of the report that did not mention Panetta’s remarks at the awards ceremony.

POGO’s new revelations include quotations from a DoD IG internal memo saying that “in general the OIG does not provide draft reports to outside stakeholders to include members of Congress and their staff.” The memo adds that Meyer was “reminded of his responsibility to ensure the protection of sensitive information to include information marked For Official Use Only.”

Contacted by Government Executive, Meyer referred inquiries to the intelligence community inspector general and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. But he supplied “documentation which he understands to have authorized the transmittal of the final draft Zero Dark Thirty Report to the congressional staff."

Another former Defense Department employee familiar with the issue, who spoke on condition of anonymity, backed Meyer, saying “he had lots of authority to use his judgment to unilaterally contact Congress.” The disclosure came in the context, the source says, of Senate staff expressing concern that the Defense IG fulfill obligations to keep the Senate committees informed of developments that, for example, could affect confirmation hearings for the next CIA director.

Meyer and others “thought the report was about final -- it had the Secretary of Defense’s memo and media talking points that staff developed,” this source said. “But because the report might embarrass Panetta and Vickers, Lynne Halbrooks pulled it.”

Halbrooks has disputed POGO’s characterization of the report and said it was produced under normal procedures without outside pressure.

Panetta told the Associated Press he did not realize the filmmaker was present when he spoke the Navy SEAL’s name.

The Defense and intelligence inspectors general offices and the Senate Intelligence Committee did not respond to requests for comment by Friday morning.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.