The FBI Has Built a Better Terrorist Watchlist

Justice IG Michael Horowitz released the report. Justice IG Michael Horowitz released the report. J. Scott Applewhite/AP file photo

The FBI has made considerable progress in improving the accuracy and timeliness of the post-9/11 terrorist watchlist, the Justice Department inspector general reported on Tuesday.

But the bureau-administered Terrorist Screening Center could do more to document investigations during national security incidents as well as better facilitate the sharing of information on terrorist suspects among agencies, the report concluded.

“During our previous audits… we found that the FBI failed to nominate to the watchlist certain subjects of terrorism investigations and was not timely in processing nominations to the watchlist,” said the fifth such report from Justice IG Michael Horowitz. “In response to our reports, the FBI revised its watchlist policy, reorganized the operational unit responsible for processing watchlist nominations, implemented new automated processes and timeliness standards for the submission and processing of watchlist actions, and established a team to assess the FBI’s performance against the new criteria.  Generally, we found that these improvements have helped to ensure that the watchlist is more complete, accurate and current.” 

The IG’s review of watchlist progress covered the period from 2009 to 2012. It was triggered by an incident in December 2009 in which a Nigerian national who became known as “the underwear bomber” tried to bring down a passenger plane en route from Amsterdam to Detroit. Before that event, the IG report said, the FBI regularly failed to act in a timely manner to nominate certain terrorist subjects under investigation to appear on the list. Communications shortfalls in the bureau’s efforts to modify procedures left the Terrorist Screening Center “unable to readily identify individuals who met the threat‑based criteria, or to easily generate a listing of all of the watchlist records that were modified,” auditors found. “As a result, the TSC relied on largely manual processes to track the watchlist modifications and related in‑depth reviews.”

But recent reviews have shown that new “policies and procedures should help to ensure that future threat‑based watchlist modifications are handled more effectively and efficiently,” the IG concluded. The report noted, however, that the FBI’s guidelines on the time it should take to open a case and nominate an appropriate suspect to the watchlist could be accelerated from the current typical time frame of 17 business days.

The IG made a dozen recommendations, including requiring the screening center to “better document its actions during national security events, clarifying FBI information sharing policies to ensure they are consistent with those of the watchlist community, and improving the efficiency of the FBI’s watchlist nomination process for investigative and non-investigative subjects.” 

The FBI agreed with all the recommendations and reported that corrective action has begun.

The agencies contributing to the terrorist watchlist include the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, the CIA, the National Security Agency, the National Reconnaissance Office and the departments of Justice, Defense, State, Treasury, Homeland Security and Energy.

Said Horowitz in a statement, “The timely handling of watchlist nominations is a matter of fundamental importance to our national security.” 

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.