Groups Gather to Define Medical Ethics in Wake of Military Torture

The sun rises above Camp Delta at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, Cuba. The sun rises above Camp Delta at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, Cuba. Charles Dharapak/AP

For more than a decade, a group of medical professors has sought to stop the mistreatment of Guantanamo Bay detainees, which they said violated medical practice and ethics.

The group—along with many others that have formed after torture and hunger strikes at Guantanamo became public knowledge—has unsuccessfully tried to get the United States to alter its military and interrogation policies to adhere more strictly to a code of medical ethics.

Now they're taking a new approach. On Monday, Boston University professors and the Constitution Project will convene in Washington with other lawyers and medical professionals to develop a consensus around a definition of medical ethics so that professional medical associations can unite to encourage physicians to act according to their own consciences.

"No physician should be expected to violate their ethics just because they have been assigned prison work," said George Annas, a BU ethics and health law professor.

The goal is to enable physicians to say no to military orders that violate a definition of medical ethics agreed upon by the professional community.

"It's ultimately corrupting to the practice of medicine," Annas said. "When high-ranking people in the United States government justify physicians violating medical ethics, that should be intolerable."

Annas and two colleagues—including BU medical professor Sondra Crosby—published an article over the summer stating that American physicians have not criticized the treatment of detainees at Guantanamo to the extent they should. Crosby said they received emailed responses "which did support the notion that doctors felt they were supposed to put the military mission ahead of the patients."

Crosby has been to Guantanamo eight times, but she said she can't publicly share what she saw. One of the issues she has with the treatment of detainees is force-feeding, a practice Defense Department officials have justified by asserting it is wrong to allow someone to die from a hunger strike.

Crosby also said the chain of command—physicians taking instructions from military personnel—puts medical practice and ethics second to military order.

"What we want to look at," Crosby said, "is what mechanisms can we put in place so that these policies are not incompatible with physicians upholding their medical ethics?"

Monday's program begins at 8 a.m. with breakfast and registration, and it's open to the public. On the agenda are the cases of two detainees, a panel on hunger strikes, and a forward-looking session with recommendations about medical practice and ethics.

The event is at the National Academy of Sciences, at 2101 Constitution Ave NW.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.