Four U.S. Soldiers Killed in Afghanistan, Hours After Taliban Talks Announced
- By Abby Ohlheiser
- Atlantic Wire
- June 19, 2013
- Comments
Defense Department file photo
No one said that the Taliban's agreement to participate in direct talks with the U.S. would be easy. But the plan's first big challenge occurred just hours after its unveiling, when four U.S. soldiers died as a result of "indirect fire" from an insurgent attack at Bagram air base, according to a U.S. official cited in multiple media reports. The conditions laid out by the U.S. as prerequisites for the direct talks include a renouncement of violence from the Taliban.
Authorities aren't confirming very much about the attacks, and it's not clear precisely who was behind it. Bagram air base is the largest of its kind used by U.S. troops in the country. Today, Afghan forces took over security responsibilities from the NATO coalition. While NATO, and the U.S., will continue to serve an advisory role in Afghanistan until 2014, they'll likely have to step in more directly as violence continues across the country.
While the Taliban's willingness to participate in direct talks is a milestone, in a way -- it'd be the first time in the entire 12-year so-called "war on terror" began that such a thing had happened -- it's got a long way to go before the two groups get in the same book, let alone on the same page, on some key issues. Earlier this year, the Taliban had called for a "spring offensive" in Afghanistan against western targets. And while it looks like maybe that plan is at least sidelined, the group is still indicating strong reluctance to condemn al Qaeda directly. So far, the Taliban agreed to release a statement indicating that "they would not allow anyone to threaten or harm other countries from Afghan soil," as the Guardian's report on the talks put it. As we explained, the negotiations, scheduled to begin Thursday, will probably be very, very messy.
By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although GovExec.com does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.
Many Feds Face Furloughs Twice
Lawmakers Push Retroactive Furlough Pay
How Long Has the Shutdown Lasted?
In Focus: Who Faces Furloughs?
No TSP Contributions During a Shutdown
How Contractors Might Weather a Shutdown
Get the Future of Defense Directly In Your Inbox
Nextgov Prime - The Most Powerful Moment in Federal IT
Sponsored
Social Business: The Power of Delivering Exceptional Customer Experiences
Research Report: Powering Continuous Monitoring Through Big Data
