Will the Boston Marathon Bombing Suspect Get the Death Penalty?

Bob Leonard/AP

Federal officials will likely seek the death penalty against the surviving suspect of the Boston bombings, who could become the first terrorist to get executed since convicted Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh.

For a man who is suspected of killing three people, including an 8-year-old boy, and with plans to carry out further attacks in New York City, the death penalty only seems justified, some former prosecutors say.

The woman who successfully argued for the execution of McVeigh, one of Washington's most prominent attorneys, former Clinton Justice Department official Beth Wilkinson, said this will be a textbook example of when the death penalty is used against federal terrorism suspects.

As law enforcement agents continue to gather evidence and build a case against Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who on Friday morning was transferred to a federal detention center, Wilkinson said prosecutors have a strong case and will likely deliver on this country’s most severe punishment.

“From what you can see in the public, I think that law enforcement has done an excellent job,” she said. “It looks like they have a wealth of information and evidence against the defendant to prove that he was involved and participated in the bombing.”

One of the biggest differences between this case and the one against McVeigh, Wilkinson said, is that it seems Tsarnaev is cooperating and talking with officials, whereas the Oklahoma City bomber exercised his right to remain silent through the entire trial. 

Not all former Justice Department officials think prosecutors should take this route. Joseph DiGenova, who was appointed by Ronald Reagan to be the  U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, said he would try to get Tsarnaev to plead guilty and avoid execution.

“If I was a prosecutor, I would want to get a deal so that he tells us everything we need to know in exchange taking the death penalty off the table and getting a full acceptance of responsibility,” he said.

However, DiGenova admits that in this circumstance, the death penalty is the likely path for the prosecution.

“This is not a case where they can play games with the death penalty,” he continued. “The people of Massachusetts may not want the death penalty in their state, but they want it today.”

While the state of Massachusetts outlawed the use of the death penalty in 1982, this case is being handled by federal authorities and thereby not limited to that state’s laws. But the U.S. attorney leading the case—in this case it’s Carmen Ortiz, who is known for her no-holds-barred approach to justice—has to go through a lengthy process to approve the punishment.

A committee in the U.S. attorney’s office in Boston reviews the case and makes a recommendation to the attorney general in Washington. He, then, has his own panel reach an independent conclusion based on its own analysis.

“In the U.S. attorney’s offices around the country, 99 percent of what happens on a daily basis they just do,” said Donald Stern, a former U.S. attorney for Massachusetts. “They’re representatives of the Department of Justice. Every once in a while, and for certain reasons, cases require very close consultation with the Department of Justice. This is one of them—not just because of the media interest, but because also it involves terrorism.”

And despite Attorney General Eric Holder’s personal objection to capital punishment—during his confirmation hearing, he told senators, “I am not a proponent of the death penalty, but I will enforce the law as this Congress gives it to us”—the Justice Department will likely recommend that sentence.

“Whether he personally believes in it or not, under his watch they’ve brought death penalty cases,” Wilkinson said.

Since McVeigh’s execution in 2001, two other men have been executed through the federal judicial system. Tsarnaev, though, would be the first terrorism suspect executed since the Oklahoma City bomber.

When the time comes for federal prosecutors to seek the death penalty against Tsarnaev, a national debate on the merits of the punishment could occur. But that debate won’t prevent Tsarnaev’s likely fate, Wilkinson said.

“There will be a lot of pressure on him to seek the death penalty for someone who uses a weapon of mass destruction in a public sporting event,” she said. “This is the kind of case the death penalty is designed for, if we’re going it at all.”

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.