Concerned About Force Reductions? The Army Is Listening

Defense Department file photo

The Army will hold listening sessions at installations nationwide to assess local community sentiments surrounding upcoming force reductions, the Army News Service reported.

As part of the 2011 Budget Control Act, the Army must reduce its force by 80,000 troops -- a cut from 570,000 troops at its peak to 490,000 -- by 2017.  The 2013 National Defense Authorization Act controls the drawdown so that no more than 15,000 soldiers leave the service annually between 2014 and 2017, according to the Army Times. The service is also expecting thousands more soldiers to leave through natural attrition.    

Army spokeswoman Lt. Col. Peggy Kageleiry said major force reductions would begin in 2014, and that the service’s leadership would take local community opinions into account before final decisions are made.

"These listening sessions are designed to enable community members to provide their concerns and unique perspectives on topics regarding their communities," Kageleiry said.

The Army emphasized that the force reductions were separate from the across-the-board cuts from sequestration currently affecting the rest of the Defense Department. However, Kageleiry said additional reductions may be necessary depending on the outcome of sequestration and the Obama administration’s fiscal 2014 budget request.  

In January 2012, Defense published a paper that outlined many of the strategic choices the military would be forced to make in light of a tighter budget environment, the Obama administration’s pivot to Asia, and the ongoing drawdown in Afghanistan. This included a wider emphasis on cyber warfare, Air-Sea assets and a “smarter” use of Defense’s resources. 

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.