Ban on A-76 competitions for outsourcing extended in omnibus bill

The consolidated spending bill that President Obama is expected to sign Friday includes language extending a three-year-old ban on A-76 studies, or agency competitions for pending work that pits federal employees against contractors.

Congress early in the Obama administration reversed a 2003 George W. Bush administration effort to outsource more agency work to contractors, prohibiting competitions run under rules from Office of Management and Budget Circular A-76.

The final version of the fiscal 2012 Financial Services Appropriations bill passed this month by Congress includes language sought by Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., that continues a prohibition on A-76 studies "to level the playing field," she said in a statement.

The bill reads: "None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this or any other act may be used to begin or announce a study or public-private competition regarding the conversion to contractor performance of any function performed by federal employees pursuant to Office of Management and Budget Circular A-76 or any other administrative regulation, directive or policy."

Mikulski said, "I'm proud of the work that we've done for our federal employees, but the job isn't over. Continuing efforts to prevent outsourcing and contracting out is important both for American taxpayers and our federal employees."

Mikulski for years has attacked such competitions for being biased against federal employees and damaging to morale. Previously, she sought to require contractors to demonstrate a savings of at least 10 percent or $10 million when compared with the cost of doing work with federal employees.

This year she introduced a broader set of changes in the form of the Correction of Long-standing Errors in Agencies Unsustainable Procurements (CLEAN UP) Act,which would reinforce insourcing by "reforming the discredited OMB Circular A-76 privatization process by ensuring all costs of conducting studies are considered," she said.

Congress' move to extend the ban on studies, while not a surprise, is "not in the taxpayers' best interest," said Rob Burton, an administrator at OMB's Office of Federal Procurement Policy during the Bush era who is now advocating for small business clients as a partner at Venable LLP. "This goes hand in hand with the Obama administration's insourcing initiative by prohibiting agencies from engaging in robust public-private competition," he said. "A-76 is based on competition and transparency, and in the last couple of years we have moved into an era when we make these decisions on what is cost-effective with no competition or transparency."

Burton added that he and a small business client are awaiting a long-delayed response to a Freedom of Information Act request about an insourcing decision. "It's very frustrating," he said. "The company could go out of business."

Roger Jordan, vice president for government relations at the Professional Services Council, a contractors trade group, said he was encouraged by passage in the House (though not the Senate) of several amendments that would have lifted the ban on A-76 competitions and eased the Defense Department's ability to resume such studies.

"We view A-76 as a tool in the toolbox," he said, "and in this age of budget constraints, it is important that agencies have all the tools available to drive efficiencies and costs savings."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.