WSJ: CIA asked to adjust drone strike policy

The CIA has secretly adjusted its drone strike campaign in Pakistan, bowing to pressure from military and diplomatic officials, The Wall Street Journal reported on Friday.

Behind closed doors, military and diplomatic officials have expressed concern that the CIA's large drone strikes are straining the relationship between the U.S. and Pakistan, The Journal reported -- although "few U.S. officials have publicly criticized the campaign, or its rapid expansion under President Barack Obama." Pakistani citizens, rising politicians, and top officials have strongly opposed the strikes, which they say kill innocent civilians.

Earlier this year, "the disputes over drones became so protracted that the White House launched a review over the summer, in which Mr. Obama intervened," The Journal reported. "Among the changes: The State Department won greater sway in strike decisions; Pakistani leaders got advance notice about more operations; and the CIA agreed to suspend operations when Pakistani officials visit the U.S."

"The White House review culminated in a Situation Room meeting with Mr. Obama in June in which he reaffirmed support for the program," The Journal noted.

Officials who spoke to The Journal had mixed reactions to the concessions, with some saying "the impact was minimal" and others saying the changes reflect a "new phase" in the CIA's drone operations.

CIA officials argue that civilian casualties have been minimal, with only 60 civilians slain "over the years," The Journal reported. Officials in both Pakistan and the United States doubt that the number is that low. The White House review was prompted by a March 17 strike that Pakistani said "killed more than 40, including innocent civilians." American officials say 20 militants were killed.

Diplomats say the CIA unleashes strikes without considering the larger diplomatic implications. The CIA has wide latitude to determine when and where to strike; the White House is often informed only after the fact.

In the spring of 2011, "military leaders increasingly found themselves on the phone" with then-CIA Director Leon Panetta "and his deputy, urging restraint in drone attacks, particularly during periods when the U.S. was engaging in high-level diplomatic exchanges with Pakistan," The Journal reported.

U.S. Ambassador to Pakistan Cameron Munter is among those who has "advocated more judicious use" of signature strikes, the Journal reported. Other skeptics have included former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen, former Defense Secretary Robert Gates, and Gen. David Petraeus, who is now the CIA director. Panetta now serves as Defense secretary.

"Some strikes on larger groups have taken place" under Petraeus, a senior intelligence official told the Journal, despite the fact the Petraeus has "voiced a preference for smaller drone strikes."

Current U.S. objectives in Pakistan underscore the complexity of both the drone strike issue and the U.S.-Pakistan relationship. While the CIA has recently "intensified strikes in Pakistan focusing on the militant Haqqani network," the State Department "is trying to enlist Pakistan's help in advancing peace talks with the Taliban," the Journal reported -- which may involve engaging diplomatically with the Haqqanis. The Haqqani network is affiliated with the Taliban, and is also closely tied to Pakistan's intelligence agency.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.