Wartime commission report on waste prompts opposing reactions

This week's report by a commission charging that contracting operations wasted as much as $60 billion in Iraq and Afghanistan was applauded by many as a prod to new reforms. But at least one contractors' group attacked the work of the congressionally chartered panel as unfair.

The Professional Services Council said in a statement Wednesday that "while the Wartime Contracting Commission's final report contains valuable lessons from contingency operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, many of its recommendations ignore the dynamic and complicated realities of contingency operations in which the otherwise cyclic phases of counterinsurgency, stabilization and longer term development efforts have been pursued concurrently."

PSC President and chief executive officer Stan Soloway said his group agrees that improved planning and more trained federal acquisition employees are needed, but he disagreed with what he called the commission's "misplaced hope that shortening contract performance periods and shunning pre-positioned supply vehicles will somehow eliminate the inherent uncertainties and risks of wartime contracting."

Soloway added that some of what the report characterizes as waste fails to factor in "the competing priorities of cost efficiencies with military, diplomatic and security goals." As an example, he cited the difficulties in transporting materials for completing a strategically important dam in Afghanistan when that country lacks transportation infrastructure.

The Obama White House, meanwhile, wasted no time in using the report as an opportunity to highlight its own work to reduce waste in contracting. Dan Gordon, administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy, wrote in a blog post Wednesday afternoon that the administration already has made significant progress addressing each of the issues raised in the commission's report, "in many cases reversing more than a decade of problems," he said. "Whether it is reducing improper payments to contractors and grantees, closing down redundant data centers, or cracking down on nonperforming contractors, we cannot tolerate the wasting of hard-earned taxpayer dollars."

Gordon cited efforts to curb waste, reduce no-bid contracts and suspend unethical contractors. "In the last 18 months alone, [the U.S. Agency for International Development] has taken more than 40 suspension or debarment actions -- almost double the number of actions taken in the prior seven years combined," he said.

The commission's final report was welcomed by the watchdog nonprofit Project on Government Oversight. The report "deserves considerable attention to ensure that past blunders are not repeated," said Scott Amey, POGO's general counsel. "The commission's finding that at least one out of every six taxpayer dollars spent in Iraq and Afghanistan was lost to waste and fraud is not surprising -- but it is absurd. In other words, for the past 10 years, the government has thrown $12 million a day out the window and received nothing in return. The government and contractors have to do a better job protecting taxpayer money, even in contingency operations."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.