Panel discusses the challenges and future of diplomacy after 9/11

Budget woes, a young workforce and tensions between the differing missions of the State and Defense departments are among the biggest challenges to diplomacy post-Sept. 11, according to a panel discussion Friday.

Hosted by the American Foreign Service Association, participants discussed how diplomacy and development have changed since Sept. 11, 2001, and what State and U.S. Agency for International Development can do to improve diplomacy in the future.

Branding became a major focus for USAID after the Sept. 11 attacks and the invasion of Afghanistan, said Andrew Natsios, former administrator of USAID.

"The flag around the world was seen as a military symbol," he said. The agency delved into an aggressive effort to improve its image and make its goals clear to potential aid recipients.

Natsios cited efforts to increase awareness among Palestinians, only 5 percent of whom knew aid was available, compared with 55 percent after the campaign.

The global response changed drastically as the United States engaged in multiple wars, said Robert Pearson, former ambassador to Turkey. While global goodwill propelled the Foreign Service through the conflict in Afghanistan, it did not carry over to the invasion of Iraq.

"Attempts to make a difference were pushed aside, and reasonable discussion did not make a difference," he said.

According to Barbara Bodine, former ambassador to Yemen, the initial global support changed over the years. "There has been a sweeping militarization of policy and a move of development work over to the military," she said.

"Our two agencies were pushed to the side," she added, referring to State and USAID. "We were in a death spiral of not being given the missions, and therefore we were not given the resources we need."

The lack of resources has affected training and development programs, said Pearson. One-third of Foreign Service officers have been with the agency for less than five years, so training is essential and diplomacy campaigns suffer without it, he added.

"The only real answer is training, or you take a hit in the field," Pearson said. "It's completely unfair. We owe them something that they're not getting."

There are other consequences of a young workforce as well. Bodine estimates 60 percent of Foreign Service officers aren't familiar with the pre-Sept. 11 style of diplomacy and government.

"We have almost forgotten what our role and value can be," she said. "We don't have the institutional memory of the role diplomats used to play."

The panelists disagreed on whether it would be beneficial for State and USAID to be grouped with Defense under one large national security umbrella budget and debated what level of collaboration should exist among the three agencies.

The budget combination could bring in more funds to State and USAID, argued Pearson. But Natsios cautioned against increased blending of the agencies.

"We need to be careful about mixing missions that are complementary. We need to understand how each other's systems work, but to say that the three missions are the same is not the case," Natsios said. "By merging them, we are weakening the institutions."

The panelists agreed, however, that Sept. 11 changed the way they viewed their missions.

"That day went from professional to personal in the snap of a finger," Pearson said.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.