Homeland Security purchase card oversight not up to snuff, watchdog finds

More than 90 percent of the Homeland Security Department's purchase card transactions do not fully comply with Office of Management and Budget guidelines, according to a new inspector general report.

Auditors also found the DHS purchase card manual lacked clear and consistent directions. "As a result, the department cannot be sure that purchase cards are always used for their intended purpose," the IG stated.

With DHS buying $514 million in goods and services with purchase cards in fiscal 2010, the IG wanted to assess the department's strengths and weaknesses in managing the program and to ensure the internal controls that track potential abuse worked properly.

Purchase cards, similar to credit cards, are used for routine transactions up to $3,000, streamlining the costly procurement process by reducing the paperwork required for major acquisitions.

The freedom they offer can lead to abuse, however.

For instance, auditors launched an investigation of the Transportation Department in April. The IG found two Federal Aviation Administration employees who used the cards to buy more than $150,000 of personal goods and services.

In 2008, OMB issued updated requirements for using purchase cards after a Government Accountability Office report found 41 percent of $14 billion in transactions were not properly authorized or signed for by an independent third party.

For the DHS audit, officials noticed patterns that sent red flags, such as purchases made on weekends and holidays. From there they saw that for a sample of 201 potentially high-risk transactions between July 2009 and May 2010, 187, or 93 percent, violated at least one of OMB's internal control requirements. For example, in 69 percent of the transactions there was no evidence an independent third party had signed for the goods or services at delivery.

The IG also analyzed 75 transactions in DHS' post-payment audit review covering July 2009 to November 2009, and found 67, or 89 percent, had insufficient documentation to meet OMB requirements.

Some of the issues could stem from incomplete, conflicting or vague information in DHS' purchase manual. For example, the guide is unclear on who must sign off on purchases. While most DHS employees still obtained written approval prior to making purchases with the cards, 36 percent of 276 total transactions the IG examined lacked a designated official's permission, and 5 percent were not approved by anyone.

The inspector general recommended Homeland Security update its purchase card manual to more effectively address all OMB requirements, review the supporting documents of transactions to verify they are valid and sufficient, and develop new techniques allowing DHS to target high-rick transactions during payment reviews.

Peggy Sherry, deputy chief financial officer, agreed with the recommendations and said DHS is working to implement them and create stronger oversight to prevent fraud, waste and abuse.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.