Administration considers expanding Afghan security forces

The Obama administration is considering boosting the Afghan security forces by as many as 73,000 as the United States prepares to begin a gradual drawdown of troops from the country in July, top Defense officials told Congress Thursday.

Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told the Senate Armed Services Committee that the exact size of the Afghan security force and how quickly it can grow are issues "still very much in discussion."

The administration is considering expanding the Afghan army and police force by 352,000 to 378,000 personnel; that would be a significant increase from the current goal of 305,000 personnel in the security forces by October.

"None of us disagree about the importance of this mission," Mullen told the committee.

In January, Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin, D-Mich., urged President Obama to sign off on a proposal to expand the Afghan forces to 378,000 and said that both Mullen and Defense Secretary Robert Gates supported that goal.

Any increase in the size of the Afghan forces would come with a hefty price tag; Levin said Thursday that NATO allies should share in that cost. He has said previously that Afghanistan should also help foot the bill.

The Pentagon's fiscal 2012 budget request includes $12.8 billion for Afghan national security forces, a figure that Gates said the United States cannot sustain indefinitely. Significantly decreasing the number of U.S. troops in Afghanistan by 2014 would help bring down the overall cost of the Afghan war and alleviate some budgetary pressures, the secretary noted.

Meanwhile, Gates said he supports the plan to begin drawing down U.S. troops in Afghanistan in July, based on conditions on the ground. But he cautioned that he does not want the drawdown to prompt a "rush to the exits" by the 50,000 allied troops currently deployed to Afghanistan.

Gates emphasized that he needs to reassure allies that any withdrawal from Afghanistan must be gradual and based upon conditions on the ground. The decrease should not be "mathematical," he said. If the United States reduces its 98,000-troop force by 1 percent or 2 percent, Gates said, allies -- particularly those with small forces -- should not necessarily do the same.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.