Inspector general for Afghanistan relieves two deputies

Arnold Fields, the retired Marine general charged with auditing the $56 billion the United States has spent rebuilding Afghanistan since 2002, removed two top deputies on Monday, saying he was announcing organizational changes that "will take the agency in a new, increasingly aggressive direction."

Fields relieved John Brummet, assistant inspector general for audits, and Raymond DiNunzio, assistant inspector general for investigations, two months after bringing in a new deputy, FBI veteran Herbert Richardson, to help run the troubled Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction.

"This was not an action of negativity, rather an action to bring in new leadership to SIGAR as the agency heads in a new direction. The men will stay on for a period of time as advisers," SIGAR spokeswoman Susan Phalen told Government Executive. "Special Inspector Fields has been conducting a top-to-bottom review of the SIGAR agency for a period of months to ensure the agency is staffed with the right professionals with the right skill sets to fulfill the mission. The recent actions are part of that ongoing review process that also takes into consideration input from stakeholders on Capitol Hill."

Field's struggle to get a handle on the billions being spent on schools, roads and job creation in the war-torn and unstable country prompted a call for his resignation in September 2010 by Sens. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo.; Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa; Tom Coburn, R-Okla.; and Susan Collins, R-Maine. He also received a negative review from the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency.

In reshaping his operation, Fields said on Monday that he had ordered a review of SIGAR's audit plan "to ensure we more aggressively include risk assessment in that strategy and increase the return on investment for the American taxpayers. Our new audit strategy will also ensure that we have an increased emphasis on contract reviews and oversight [while SIGAR's investigations] will more robustly focus resources on complex contract fraud and financial corruption."

Fields told reporters on Dec. 20 that the number of U.S. dollars squandered in Afghanistan could be in the billions because "there are no controls in place sufficient enough to ensure taxpayers' money is used for the [intended] purpose." That comment reflected a group of audits and a quarterly report SIGAR released in late October showing, for example, the U.S. has lost track of salary supplements paid to Afghan gardeners, drivers, cooks and technical advisers who can receive up to 20 times what the country's civil servants typically earn.

"It is outrageous that the U.S. government can't even determine the amount we pay to support Afghan government employees, or how many people are paid," Fields said.

Those audits won approval from at least one longtime critic of SIGAR. Danielle Brian, executive director of the Project on Government Oversight, said the October reports were "more in line with what Congress wants. It's the kind of thing we'd like to see more of."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.