Poll finds new low in Afghan war support

Even as the Obama administration's forthcoming Afghanistan-Pakistan review largely touts the U.S. military strategy there as a success, a new poll reveals that a large percentage of Americans say that the nine-year war is not worth fighting.

According to an ABC News/Washington Post poll released Thursday, about 60 percent of Americans said that the war is "not worth fighting," a new high in public dissatisfaction and a 7-point increase since July. Only 34 percent said that the war is indeed worth fighting, down 9 points to a new low.

President Obama called for a revised strategy of the war last year, agreeing to send in an additional 30,000 troops to bolster a U.S. offensive to dismantle and defeat Taliban strongholds, particularly in the south. A year later, "the momentum achieved by the Taliban in recent years has been arrested in much of the country and reversed in some key areas," according to the summary of the White House-commissioned Afghanistan-Pakistan review.

Even so, the current levels of disapproval for the war in Afghanistan compare with those for the war in Iraq, which wreaked havoc on President Bush's approval ratings during his second term. Obama's ratings for handling the war, however, are "considerably better than Bush's," the poll says.

According to the poll, 45 percent approve of Obama's "work on Afghanistan," while 46 percent disapprove. These are mixed results, to be sure, but during Bush's second term, an average of 63 percent disapproved of his handling of the Iraq war.

U.S. gains in the region "remain fragile and reversible," the summary of the Afghanistan-Pakistan review states, calling for a need to make more progress with Pakistan to eliminate the militant strongholds across the lawless border. Even so, the review says that the successes on the ground set the stage for a "responsible, conditions-based U.S. troop reduction in July 2011," in accordance with the Obama administration's timeline last year. Under the plan outlined at the NATO summit in Lisbon, Portugal, last month, U.S. troops are expected to remain in the country until at least 2014.

The full version of the Afghanistan-Pakistan review is expected to stop short of announcing estimates for how many troops will be withdrawn, and from which areas of the country. Fifty-four percent of Americans support the 2011 drawdown time frame, according to the poll, up 15 points since the timetable was announced last year.

The poll also says 27 percent want the withdrawal to begin sooner; 12 want a later date, down 7 points from a year ago.

The troop surge and expanded special operations forces in the country have been essential to progress made in "clearing the Taliban heartland" in Afghanistan, the report states. Yet the poll results show that now, Americans are evenly split 48-48 percent in their support or disapproval of the troop surge Obama mandated last year.

Meanwhile, troop casualties have only increased in the last year. According to icasualties.org, 489 U.S. troops have been killed and 4,481 wounded in 2010, compared with 317 killed and 2,144 wounded in 2009, and 155 killed, 793 wounded in 2008.

Even Republicans, a group much more supportive as a whole of the war in Afghanistan, reported significant dips in their approval. About half of Republicans said the war has "not been worth it, down a dramatic 35 points from the high in 2007," according to the poll's summary. Republican approval for Obama's handling of the war has tanked by 17 points since July.

This is a "a conundrum for Obama," the poll's summary states, "in that the group that most favors the war least likes his handling of it."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.