Senator calls for permanent wartime contracting watchdog

Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., said Tuesday the Defense Department should establish a permanent inspector general office to oversee wartime contracting in an effort to avoid repeating mistakes in Iraq and Afghanistan that have resulted in the waste of billions of taxpayer dollars.

The former state auditor, speaking at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on the Defense Department's efficiency initiative to redirect $100 billion in overhead savings to battlefield needs, said, "I think it's very conservative to think we've had $100 billion go up in smoke in Iraq."

McCaskill proposed creating a permanent IG office dedicated to contingency contracting oversight. Such an office could institutionalize the lessons learned by the Office of the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction under the stewardship of Stuart W. Bowen, whose reports should be required reading for military commanders, she said.

"You would have continuity in terms of staff that felt committed to that particular activity, as opposed to [asking] 'How long are we going to be around and do I need to hitch my star to another moving target?' " McCaskill said.

"We've got really good people that learned a lot in Iraq, and then we're trying to re-create the same kind of office in Afghanistan," she added. "It seems to me we're missing opportunities here."

Ashton B. Carter, undersecretary of Defense for acquisition, technology and logistics, said, "I hear you loud and clear. I'll take that back to the department for consideration."

McCaskill also reiterated her call to have Arnold Fields, the special inspector general for Afghanistan, removed from his post after a review found he had issued a no-bid contract hiring Joseph Schmitz, a former Defense Department inspector general who resigned in 2005. Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, launched a probe of whether Schmitz had blocked two criminal investigations. In 2006, the Integrity Committee of the President's Council on Integrity and Efficiency cleared Schmitz of any wrongdoing.

"I have written now three letters to the president about the special inspector general over Afghanistan," McCaskill said. "We now have had an independent review of his work by a team of auditors, a peer review, and they have said [his office] is woefully lacking. Probably the whip cream and the cherry on this particular situation is that here's somebody who's supposed to be the eyes and ears looking at contracting in a major way, and he hires someone on a no-bid contract for $95,000 for two months' work."

"The special inspector general over Afghanistan should be fired today," McCaskill said.

She exhorted Carter and Gen. James Cartwright, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, to take that message to Defense Secretary Robert Gates: "I know the kind of respect the president has for Secretary Gates. If Secretary Gates weighed in on this I think we'd get some action. It's enough to make the top of my head blow off."

CORRECTION: The original version of this article described Joseph Schmitz as "a former Defense Department inspector general who resigned under allegations of misconduct in 2005." Schmitz's resignation was unrelated to the charges of misconduct, of which he was exonerated by the Integrity Committee of the President's Council on Integrity and Efficiency in 2006. The article has been updated to correct the error.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.