Lawmaker finds Defense IG is doing less with more

The Pentagon's chief watchdog has strayed from its core mission of detecting waste, fraud and abuse and is slipping in productivity, according to a new Senate report.

In fiscal 2009, the Defense Department Inspector General's Audit Office did not investigate any "major or nonmajor weapons contract or contractor," the report released on Thursday by the office of Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, said. The IG left that mission to the Defense Contract Audit Agency, Senate staffers said, adding DCAA is not independent from Pentagon management and has its own potential competency issues.

"As the [Office of Inspector General] has drifted away from its core mission of conducting contract audits, it chose to move in an ill-advised direction," the 73-page report said. "Today, the majority of audits appear to be nothing more than quasi-academic reviews of DoD policies and procedures. The DoD OIG has become the department's 'policy police.' "

Potential criminal activity also has become less of a focus, Grassley's office found. The DoD IG Audit Office made nine referrals to the Defense Criminal Investigative Service in fiscal 2009. None resulted in criminal prosecution, the report said.

Overall, the 765-person audit office issued just 113 reports in fiscal 2009, its lowest total in two decades. In 1995, when the office had 717 auditors, the IG published 264 reports, the Senate staffers said. The productivity level at Defense also pales in comparison to auditors at the Health and Human Services, Housing and Urban Development, and Homeland Security departments, investigators found.

And despite conducting less labor-intensive contract audits, the office is averaging 18 months to issue reports, Grassley's staff found. Some audits have dragged on longer than three years, and others have taken so long the IG eventually scrapped them.

Investigators also found audit teams were no longer able to conduct full-scope, end-to-end contract audits. Supervisors told Grassley's staff auditors no longer verify payments at the primary source -- the Defense Finance and Accounting Service -- because of the difficulty of the effort. If auditors do not check payments and match them with contracts and deliveries, then it is unlikely they will discover fraud and waste, the report noted.

"If audit capabilities are seriously degraded or crippled, as suggested in this report, then OIG oversight is gravely impaired, leaving huge sums of the taxpayers' money vulnerable to fraud and outright theft," the report said. "The OIG Audit junkyard dog has been defanged and rendered harmless."

Grassley sent the findings to Defense Secretary Robert Gates on Tuesday. In the letter, the senator called for a major retooling of the inspector general's office, noting that without significant audit reforms, the Pentagon would not be able to meet its goal of rooting out $100 billion in wasteful spending during the next five years.

"You need a better mix of weapons in your arsenal to get the job done," Grassley wrote. "You need independent backup and audit support from the Office of the Inspector General."

Investigators recommended the office create significantly larger audit teams of up to 100 staffers to tackle the department's most egregious contract problems.

If the office's slide continues, Grassley suggested Congress might not provide the Defense IG with requested funds to hire 235 additional auditors during the next five years.

Defense IG Gordon S. Heddell acknowledged the Senate findings and said he was addressing audit timeliness and relevance.

"The observations and recommendations made by Sen. Grassley are relevant -- and important -- but they are only one piece of a much bigger transformation that I embarked upon well over a year ago when I was confirmed by the Senate as IG," Heddell said in a statement.

IG officials said some audit successes are being overlooked. Documents the office provided highlighted recent staff awards and critical reports that have resulted in funds being returned to taxpayers.

"This year alone, our auditors have saved the department $4.1 billion," said Mary L. Ugone, deputy inspector general for auditing. "We have placed significant emphasis on life and safety issues affecting our men and women in uniform, such as testing body armor and acquiring counter [improvised explosive] devices. The work of audit is not just about dollars; it's about protecting the warfighter."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.