White House and Pentagon clear way for repeal of military ban on gays

The Obama administration cautiously endorsed plans to repeal "don't ask, don't tell" on Monday, paving the way for Congress to overturn the 17-year ban on homosexuals serving in the military.

In response to letters from lawmakers eager to press for a vote, Office of Management and Budget Director Peter R. Orszag said the White House would support measures to repeal the ban, with the provision that changes would be rolled out only after a Pentagon working group finished a review on how to implement a policy reversal. That study is due to Congress by Dec. 1.

Rep. Patrick Murphy, D-Pa., and Sens. Carl Levin, D-Mich., chairman of the Armed Services Committee, and Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, announced the legislative proposal on May 24 after Congress and the White House reached a compromise. The Senate Armed Services Committee is expected to vote on the amendment to the fiscal 2011 National Defense Authorization Act by the end of the week, and the House is expected to vote on a similar measure this week.

Ideally, Congress would take legislative action after the review, Orszag said in his statement. But, he added, holding off on immediately implementing changes "recognizes the critical need to allow our military and their families the full opportunity to inform and shape the implementation process through a thorough understanding of their concerns, insights, and suggestions."

In a similar vein, Defense Secretary Robert Gates acknowledged under ideal circumstances, the review would have been completed before lawmakers took any action. In late April, Gates and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen wrote to Congress requesting that lawmakers hold off on a vote to repeal the policy until after a comprehensive study.

"With Congress having indicated that is not possible, the secretary can accept the language in the proposed amendment," said Gates' chief spokesman, Geoff Morrell, in a statement.

The circumstances are surprising, considering statements made in Congress last week that indicated lawmakers were reluctant to address the hot-button issue.

During a May 19 markup of the authorization bill, Rep. Ike Skelton, D-Mo., chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, said he and the panel's ranking member, Rep. Howard McKeon, R-Calif., "agreed to support Adm. Mullen and Secretary Gates' request for time to study the issue. And we do not support this issue being raised in this markup."

According to the watchdog organization Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, more than 13,500 soldiers have been discharged since 1994 because of the ban.

Right-leaning groups have argued overturning the ban would adversely affect military morale and readiness. But a CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey released on Tuesday revealed that 78 percent of the public supports openly gay people serving in the military.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.