U.S. must counter Chinese military gains, senators say

U.S. armed services need to develop potentially expensive new capabilities to offset China's rapidly growing capacity to counter America's military advantage in the Western Pacific, but face a "constrained fiscal environment" that will require difficult choices in the future.

Those were the conflicting views presented by two key senators and a panel of defense experts at a Capitol Hill forum Tuesday.

The forum, sponsored by the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, a Washington-based defense think tank, focused on the AirSea Battle concept that is being developed in an Air Force-Navy study. The two services' leaders launched the study in reaction to the rising concerns that China's extensive military buildup emphasizes "anti-access, area-denial" capabilities that would prevent U.S. forces from intervening in a future conflict over Taiwan.

Senate Armed Services Air-Land Subcommittee Chairman Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., said the new concept was important because China wants to be capable of not just overcoming U.S. air and naval superiorities, "but making them irrelevant." He cited Beijing's arsenal of hundreds of missiles able to hit U.S. bases and carriers far away and its weapons to disable the communications and spy satellites the United States depends on.

To prevent tensions from escalating into conflict, America must make it clear to its allies and to China "that we are committed to maintaining our capabilities in the Western Pacific," Lieberman said.

But, he added, this commitment will be hindered by the nation's "constrained fiscal environment." Lieberman quoted recent warnings from Defense Secretary Robert Gates that the large post-9/11 increase in defense spending could not be sustained.

"Those are not hollow words," Lieberman said, noting that they come when the Navy is struggling to build the fleet and strike fighter force it needs.

"Like it or not, there are difficult decisions we'll have to make," he said.

Air-Land Subcommittee ranking member John Thune, R-S.D., shared those concerns, noting that while the military has been focusing on relatively low-tech battles in Iraq and Afghanistan, there is a significant high-tech battle emerging to counter China's capabilities.

A key weapon to do that, he said, is the new long-range strike capability that the Air Force is seeking. With a B-1B bomber wing at Ellsworth Air Force Base in his state, Thune has made long-range strike his major defense issue.

A detailed study on the AirSea Battle concept released by CSBA on Tuesday also cited as a priority better long-range strike capabilities, which could include conventionally armed intercontinental ballistic missiles.

Another priority would be to counter China's vast missile arsenal by "blinding" its ability to target U.S. carriers at long range. That could require destroying China's spy satellites.

Those are highly controversial ideas, strongly opposed by organizations against militarizing space and by Russian officials and arms control advocates who fear the launch of a conventionally armed ICBM could trigger a nuclear retaliation.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.